MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4210897933 · doi:10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36223

THE SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF RHYTHMIC VIBROTACTILE AND AUDITORY BIOFEEDBACK ON THE GAIT OF INDIVIDUALS AFTER WEIGHT-INDUCED ASYMMETRY

2022· article· en· W4210897933 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Alexandria Michelini, Harry Sivasambu, Jan Andrysek

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Établissements canadiensHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCadenceAnkleMetronomeRhythmPhysical medicine and rehabilitationGaitPsychologyStimulationMedicineBiofeedbackPhysical therapyAudiologyNeuroscienceSurgeryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Biofeedback (BFB), the practice of providing real-time sensory feedback has been shown to improve gait rehabilitation outcomes. BFB training through rhythmic stimulation has the potential to improve spatiotemporal gait asymmetries while minimizing cognitive load by encouraging a synchronization between the user’s gait cycle and an external rhythm. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate if rhythmic stimulation can improve the stance time symmetry ratio (STSR) and to compare vibrotactile to auditory stimulation. Gait parameters including velocity, cadence, stride length, double support time, and step length symmetry, were also examined. METHODOLOGY: An experimental rhythmic stimulation system was developed, and twelve healthy adults (5 males), age 28.42 ± 10.93 years, were recruited to participate in walking trials. A unilateral ankle weight was used to induce a gait asymmetry to simulate asymmetry as commonly exhibited by individuals with lower limb amputation and other clinical disorders. Four conditions were evaluated: 1) No ankle weight baseline, 2) ankle weight without rhythmic stimulation, 3) ankle weight + rhythmic vibrotactile stimulation (RVS) using alternating motors and 4) ankle weight + rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) using a single-tone metronome at the participant’s self-selected cadence. FINDINGS: As expected the STSR became significantly more asymmetrical with the ankle weight (i.e. induced asymmetry condition). STSR improved significantly with RVS and RAS when compared to the ankle weight without rhythmic stimulation. Cadence also significantly improved with RVS and RAS compared to ankle weight without rhythmic stimulation. With the exception of double support time, the other gait parameters were unchanged from the ankle weight condition. There were no statistically significant differences between RVS and RAS. CONCLUSION: This study found that rhythmic stimulation can improve the STSR when an asymmetry is induced. Moreover, RVS is at least as effective as auditory stimulation in improving STSR in healthy adults with an induced gait asymmetry. Future work should be extended to populations with mobility impairments and outside of laboratory settings. Layman's Abstract Providing feedback to users in real-time has been shown to improve walking in many populations with gait deviations. Feedback in the form of rhythmic stimulation involves consistent cues to which the user matches their movement. This work compared the effects of sound-based (RAS) and vibration-based (RVS) stimulation systems on the walking symmetry of healthy adults. A simple stimulation system was used with twelve healthy adults in walking trials. The walking trials included some in which the participant wore an ankle weight on a single leg to create a non-symmetrical walking pattern. Four different conditions were tested: No ankle weight, with an ankle weight, with an ankle weight and RAS, and with an ankle weight and RVS. Walking symmetry improved with both RVS and RAS compared to ankle weight only. Walking speed, cadence, and step length did not change. These findings show that RVS is at least as effective as RAS and may be a useful technique for gait rehabilitation. Future work should involve clinical populations and in real-world settings. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/36223/29090 How To Cite: Michelini A., Sivasambu H., Andrysek J. The short-term effects of rhythmic vibrotactile and auditory biofeedback on the gait of individuals after weight-induced asymmetry. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.6. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36223 Corresponding Author: Jan Andrysek, PhDBloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,E-Mail: jandrysek@hollandbloorview.ca ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4976-1228

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,149
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,266 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2022
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics JournalMême sujetBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionTravaux en français237 207