Ameloblastoma in the Hong Kong Chinese. Part 1: systematic review and clinical presentation
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: The aim of Part 1 of this study was to determine the clinical presentation of central ameloblastomas in the Hong Kong Chinese and to compare them with other reported series by a systematic review (SR). METHODS: The study had two elements, that of a complete series of all ameloblastomas presenting at a major Chinese maxillofacial surgical unit as well as a SR. The files of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the University of Hong Kong between 1989 and 2000 were reviewed for ameloblastoma cases. The relevant literature was identified by electronic databases, review of citation lists and hand searching of key journals. The principal selection criterion was that the study should represent a complete collection of cases. RESULTS: Fifty-three published series of cases were included in the SR. They generally reported little more than sex, mean age and range, and affected jaw. Only 16 studies considered recurrence. Sixty-one cases of ameloblastoma were identified in the present study. There were 30 males and 31 females, contrary to the predilection for males in other reports. Eighty-four percent of cases were found in the mandible, agreeing with the SR. The mean age at first presentation was 30.5 years, lower than that of the SR; only a Korean report and a small Bangladeshi report showed younger presentation. The present report had the shortest period between first becoming aware of the lesion and seeking treatment; this period was significantly shorter for younger patients. Although the present study was in agreement with the SR with regard to swelling, this study reported a significantly higher proportion of patients presenting with pain. CONCLUSION: Although the presentation of ameloblastoma within this Chinese community was broadly similar to that observed in other populations, it differed in a number of important respects. It had a younger age at first presentation than many other communities, including other Orientals; it was associated with a shorter period between first becoming aware of the lesion and seeking treatment, particularly in the young; and it was more frequently associated with pain than in the SR.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle