A178 BIOLOGIC THERAPY DURING PREGNANCY AS PER GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS REDUCES ADVERSE PREGNANCY RELATED OUTCOMES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) disease activity during pregnancy is associated with adverse neonatal and pregnancy-related outcomes. Biologics are used to suppress disease activity but crosses the placenta in the third trimester. Conflicting studies and guidelines on the timing of biologic dosing in pregnancy persist as we try to balance the risk of disease flare and possible adverse drug effects. The American Gastroenterology Association (AGA) recommends timing the final dose according to the half-life and dosing regimen of each biologic agent. Aims To compare neonatal and pregnancy-related outcomes in early versus late dosing of biologics. Methods This was a single-center retrospective cohort study conducted at Mount Sinai Hospital from 2016–2021. We included patients with an established diagnosis of IBD before pregnancy who were at least 18 years of age at the time of conception. All patients must have been treated with an IBD-specific biologic agent and had a documented final dose during the pregnancy. The early group received their last biologic dose earlier than the AGA recommendations and the late group received it within the recommended interval. A patient was considered to have a flare based on the overall clinical impression of their gastroenterologist informed by reported symptoms, investigations (fecal calprotectin, endoscopy), and response to treatment. Neonatal and pregnancy-related outcomes were compared amongst the two groups using the student’s t-test (for continuous variables) and Fischer’s exact test (for categorical variables) using SPSS Version 27. Results Of 322 patients who had a completed pregnancy at Mount Sinai Hospital, 107 were included in this study. 67 (62.6%) were in the early and 40 (37.4%) were in the late groups. Baseline characteristics including age, comorbidities, IBD phenotype and disease activity were similar between the two groups. The late group had significantly later gestational ages (37.4 vs 38.7 weeks, p=0.006), higher 5-minute Apgar scores (8.7 vs. 9.0, p=0.042), fewer NICU admissions (25.4% vs 5.0%, p=0.036), and fewer IBD flares (28.3% vs 11.1%, p=0.039) in the 6-month post-partum period. There were no significant differences in the rates of premature birth, caesarian sections, infections, and congenital abnormalities. Results are displayed in figure 1. Conclusions Our study suggests that late dosing of biologics according to the AGA guidelines was associated with favourable outcomes. However, this is an unadjusted analysis based on retrospective data and findings should be confirmed in a prospective manner to account for confounders. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».