Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation focuses on the relationship between gender equality and economic development, broadly defined. Since the seminal work of Ester Boserup (1970), gender equality is widely understood as being both an instrument for and a consequence of economic development. The first three chapters of this thesis revolve around two fundamental questions. What are the consequences of gender inequality for economic development? (Chapter 1.) And what are its causes—i.e., why do we observe gender inequality in all societies, although to different extents? (Chapters 2 and 3.) As argued in the thesis, social and cultural norms on gender roles will contribute a great deal to how we think about these issues. In the final chapter (Chapter 4), I investigate an episode of rapid change in social norms, in a context of mass emigration. Even though that essay does not deal with gender equality directly, it suggests that migration may be a powerful vehicle for cultural change in developing countries. A short description of each chapter follows. In the first chapter, co-authored by Stephan Klasen, we review theories where gender equality is instrumental for economic development. The vast majority of theories reviewed suggest that gender inequality is a barrier to development, particularly over the long run. Among the many plausible mechanisms through which inequality between men and women affects the aggregate economy, the role of women for fertility decisions and human capital investments is particularly important. In the second chapter, co-authored by Stephan Klasen, Janneke Pieters, and Le Thi Ngoc Tu, we investigate the determinants of labor force participation of urban married women, since the early 2000s, in eight developing and emerging economies: Bolivia, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Jordan, South Africa, Tanzania, and Vietnam. Using large household and labor force surveys, we build a unified empirical framework that allows for comparative analyses across time and space. We find that the coefficients to women’s characteristics differ substantially across countries, and this explains most of the between-country differences in participation rates. In the third chapter, co-authored by Amy C. Alexander, Stephan Klasen, and Christian Welzel, we argue that part of these between-country structural differences are rooted in a society’s distant past. Reviewing the literature on the deep historic roots of gender inequality, we theorize and provide evidence for a trajectory that (1) originates in a climatic configuration called the "Cool Water” (CW-) condition, leading to (2) late female marriages in preindustrial times, which eventually pave the way towards (3) various gender egalitarian outcomes today. The CW-condition is a specific climatic configuration that combines periodically frosty winters with mildly warm summers under the ubiquitous accessibility of fresh water. It embodies opportunity endowments that significantly reduce fertility pressures. The resulting household formation patterns empowered women and reduced gender inequality. The existence of cultural persistence does not necessary imply that societies are trapped in paths pre-determined by their history. There are moments of rapid and widespread change, where long-held norms and customary social behaviors suddenly collapse. International migration is one of those forces that transfer norms across countries. In the fourth chapter, co-authored by Lisa Sofie Hoeckel and Tobias Stoehr, we provide evidence for one such instance of widespread social change caused by international migration: a reduction in petty corruption in the education system of the origin country.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».