A212 LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS (PSC): EXPERIENCE FROM THE LAST THREE DECADES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background In liver transplantation (LT) for PSC, pre-transplant colectomy may lower the risk of PSC recurrence (rPSC), and well-controlled or lack of IBD may protect against rPSC, however, these findings are not consistent across all studies. It is unknown whether recipient/donor sex plays a role in rPSC. Aims To study factors associated with PSC recurrence in the post-transplant population. Methods This is a retrospective study on adults who received an LT for PSC in Halifax NS from 1985 to 2020. Graft and patient outcomes are analyzed by logistic regression models. Results A total of 92 patients underwent deceased donor LT for PSC with a mean follow-up time of 9.2 yrs (SD 7.1). Fifty-three remain active in the program, 2 were lost to follow up and 37 died. The mean age at transplant was 43 (SD13, range 18.9–67.8). Seven patients had a second transplant. The five- and 10-year patient survival rate of the entire cohort was 78.7% and 66% respectively. In the active cohort, the prevalence of rPSC was 23.5% (12/51). Retransplantation for rPSC occurred in 8.3% (1/12). The prevalence of IBD was 82.4% (42/51), consisted of ulcerative pancolitis (64.7%, 33/51), ulcerative proctitis (3.9%), left-sided UC (2%) and Crohn’s disease (9.8%). Males are much more likely than females to undergo a colectomy at any time (OR 5.5, 95% CI 1.07–28.22, p 0.041). Refractory IBD was the predominant indication for a colectomy (10/16), followed by dysplasia or colon cancer (6/16). In the post-transplant period, 69% had stable IBD without therapy escalation, 11.9% were escalated to a biologic, 19% underwent a colectomy for active IBD symptoms. Pre-transplant colectomy negatively predicted rPSC, in this subgroup 0% (0/6) developed rPSC. Neither recipient sex (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.26–5.0, p 0.86) or recipient age predicted the likelihood of rPSC. There was no association between donor sex on rPSC (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.30–5.27, p 0.76). A trend towards increased rPSC was observed in male donors to female recipients versus female-to-female transplants (OR 6, 95% CI 0.33–107.42, p 0.224). Overall, having a post-transplant colectomy, subtotal or total, irrespective of timing, did not significantly impact rPSC (OR 0.389, 95% CI 0.09–1.66, p 0.20). Diagnosis of IBD was not associated with an increased risk of rPSC (OR 1.21, p 0.83). Conclusions Several factors were associated with rPSC after liver transplant in patients with PSC and IBD, pre-transplant colectomy was found to be protective, male donor to female recipient was a potential risk factor. It is important to study these factors in multi-centered cohorts to understand the pathogenesis of PSC. Pre-transplant total colectomy may be beneficial for several reasons, reducing rPSC, controlling IBD activities, and lowering dysplasia and colon cancer rates in the post-transplant population. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».