MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4213105923 · doi:10.5858/arpa.2021-0482-ed

Cystic and Intraductal Neoplasms of the Pancreatobiliary Tract

2022· article· en· W4213105923 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExcellenceIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmPancreasEndomicroscopyDigestive tractAnatomical pathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society (PBPS) would like to thank Alain C. Borczuk, MD, and the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine for again highlighting our society by publishing 4 review articles based on the presentations at the PBPS companion society symposium at the 2020 United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP) meeting. Our mission is to educate surgical pathologists and cytopathologists on the importance of the advances in this complex area and hopefully transform the way we practice pancreatobiliary pathology. The PBPS fosters excellence and international collaboration in education, research, and the global practice of pancreatobiliary pathology. PBPS became an official society in 2016 and a USCAP companion society in 2018, but the sharing of knowledge, enthusiasm, and ideas in pancreatobiliary pathology started more than 20 years ago as an annual “Pancreas Club” luncheon held during the USCAP meeting, which grew over the years and became the PBPS. The first advisory council members of the Pancreas Club were Volkan Adsay, MD; Ralph Hruban, MD; David Klimstra, MD; Günter Klöppel, MD; and Giuseppe Zamboni, MD. Thanks to their dedication to pancreatobiliary pathology and contagious enthusiasm, many other pathologists interested in pancreatobiliary pathology were attracted to join and motivated the transformation into the official 501c3 society that it is today (PBPath.org).The 2020 PBPS Companion Society Symposium was entitled “Cystic and Intraductal Neoplasms of the Pancreatobiliary Tract” and consisted of 5 outstanding presentations entitled (1) “Preoperative Molecular Assessment of Pancreatic Cysts and Intraductal Lesions,” (2) “Cytologic Assessment of Cystic/Intraductal Lesions of the Pancreatobiliary Tract,” (3) “Mucinous Cystic and Intraductal Neoplasms of the Pancreatobiliary Tract,” (4) “Nonmucinous Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas,” and (5) “Management Algorithms for Pancreatic Cysts and Intraductal Neoplasms: The Surgeon's Perspective.” These topics represented a 360-degree expert evaluation of cystic and intraductal pancreatobiliary lesions and were given in the same stepwise manner in which they are often encountered, from the cytomorphologic and molecular characteristics to their histomorphology, and finally to management from a surgeon's perspective.Four of the presentations from the 2020 companion meeting have been converted into review articles in this issue of Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. In the first article, Michelle Reid, MD, MS, reviews the cytologic features of cystic and intraductal pancreatobiliary tract lesions. Dr Reid emphasizes the use of an integrated, multidisciplinary approach for the evaluation of cystic/intraductal pancreatobiliary tract lesions, incorporating clinical, radiologic, and cytologic findings with chemical and molecular cyst fluid analysis as well as ancillary studies for definitive diagnosis and classification (and, where applicable, grading) of mucinous and nonmucinous cystic lesions. She also describes the cytologic features of tumoral intraepithelial neoplasms, intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms (IOPNs), intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms (ITPNs), and intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct (IPNB), which may be sampled by bile duct brushing or fine-needle aspiration biopsy. The second article examines recent advances in mucinous cystic and intraductal neoplasms of the pancreatobiliary tract and is written by David Klimstra, MD, along with his colleague Kerem Ozcan, MD. In this article Drs Klimstra and Ozcan explore the clinicopathologic, genetic, and prognostic features of cystic and intraductal mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas, including mucinous cystic neoplasms and pancreatic intraductal neoplasms, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), IOPN, and ITPN. Additionally, the histologic features of preinvasive mass-forming neoplasms of the bile duct IPNB, IOPN, and ITPN are described, along with similarities and differences compared with their pancreatic counterparts. Recently described aspects of morphology, grading, classification, and genomic alterations in these neoplasms are emphasized. The third article is on nonmucinous cystic lesions of the pancreas and is by Irene Esposito, MD, and her colleague Lena Haeberle, MD. In this article Drs Esposito and Haeberle examine the spectrum of nonmucinous cystic lesions of the pancreas and their different biological behaviors. They review serous cystic neoplasms, solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms, cystic neuroendocrine tumors, and pancreatitis-associated pseudocysts, and discuss their epidemiology and clinical and gross features as well as their histomorphology, immunohistochemistry, molecular profile, and prognostic associations. The fourth and final article is entitled “Management Algorithms for Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: The Surgeon's Perspective” and is written by Jin-Young Jang, MD, PhD, along with his colleague Hyeong Seok Kim, MD. Drs Jang and Kim review the current status of pancreatic cystic neoplasms including IPMNs, their epidemiology, malignancy risk, and treatment-related factors. They also discuss optimal management algorithms for IPMNs, which require thoughtful assessment to determine the indication for resection. The use of nomograms, surveillance, and other management strategies in customizing IPMN management is explored, along with more tailored approaches to surgical intervention versus surveillance.We are extremely proud of our society and the continued contributions of its members to the field of pancreatobiliary pathology. We hope that you will enjoy these review articles exploring a unique, 360-degree (cytopathologist's, surgical pathologist's, and surgeon's) perspective on cystic and intraductal neoplasms of the pancreatobiliary tract.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,275 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineMême sujetPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchTravaux en français237 207