A174 PERCEPTIONS OF CANNABIS USE IN WOMEN WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Cannabis use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may lead to improvement in pain and general health perception. However, its use during pregnancy may result in adverse outcomes such as preterm birth and altered fetal brain development. It remains unknown how women with IBD perceive Cannabis use during pregnancy and whether they discuss its use with their health-care providers. Aims To determine practices in, and perceptions of, cannabis use during pregnancy in women with IBD of reproductive age. Methods Women with IBD (age 18–45) were recruited at Mount Sinai Hospital and via social media platforms. Participants anonymously completed surveys on baseline demographics and IBD characteristics. They also completed a Cannabis questionnaire which asked about current use, perceived risks during pregnancy, and discussions with health-care providers. Categorical variables were reported as frequencies and compared using the chi-square test. Continuous variables were reported as medians and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results Sixty-four women were included, 26 (40.6%) with ulcerative colitis, 37 (57.8%) with Crohn’s disease, and 1 (1.6%) with indeterminate colitis. Nineteen (29.7%) were preconception, 40 (62.5%) were pregnant, and 5 (7.8%) were post-partum. Eleven (18.0%) patients reported current Cannabis use, 4 (6.3%) during pregnancy. Cannabis users were more likely to have discussed its use with a health-care provider compared to non-users (45.5% vs. 5.7%, p<0.001) and had longer IBD duration (12.00 vs. 9.00 years, p=0.05). Twenty-five (42.4%) were unsure of the risks of Cannabis use in pregnancy, of which only two had discussed this with a health-care provider. Reasons for fear of Cannabis use included risk of fetal oxygen restriction (n=13, 20.3%), impact on brain development (n=29, 46.0%), and risk of fetal respiratory issues (n=18, 28.6%). Only eight (12.5%) patients reported having a conversation about Cannabis use during pregnancy with their health-care provider; all of whom felt its consumption was unsafe during pregnancy. Conclusions Many women with IBD report being unsure of risks of Cannabis use during pregnancy. With the legalization of Cannabis in Canada, it is imperative patients and health-care providers discuss the risks and benefits of its use, particularly during vulnerable times such as pregnancy. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».