A67 ABC, EASY AS 123, SIMPLE AS GLUTEN-FREE? KNOWLEDGE AND ADHERENCE IN ADOLESCENTS WITH CELIAC DISEASE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Research shows that adolescents with celiac disease (CeD) are at great risk for non-adherence to the gluten-free diet (GFD), and that knowledge of the GFD may play a role in adherence. Aims The primary objective of this study was to examine the relationship between patient knowledge and adherence to the GFD in a local population of adolescents with CeD. Secondary objectives were to identify information sources used to learn about the GFD, and compare adolescent and parent knowledge of the GFD. Methods Adolescents with CeD (12–17 years) were recruited at pediatric gastroenterology clinics in Calgary, Alberta. Preliminary data was collected October 2020 to August 2021. Both the adolescent and a parent were asked to complete a 5 minute online survey received via email. Survey measures included a validated adherence scale (Biagi score) and a unique knowledge assessment (GFD-Q), adapted from a previously published questionnaire. GFD-Q scores were categorized as “sufficient knowledge” based on correctly identifying 3/3 gluten-containing foods, at least 4/7 of gluten-free foods, and at least 4/7 foods that may contain gluten. Respondents submitted demographic and clinical information, as well as reviewed information sources used to learn about the GFD. Results Initial data were reviewed for 25 participant pairs (adolescent with respective parent), with a planned sample size of 40 participant pairs. Most adolescents (96%) reported adherence to the GFD (Biagi score of 3 or 4). Eleven (44%) adolescents had sufficient knowledge of the GFD. About 90% of adolescents correctly identified which foods to question, however, 20% did not correctly identify a gluten-containing food (namely malt), and 36% did not identify most gluten-free foods (such as maltodextrin and balsamic vinegar). Parents scored higher on the GFD-Q with 17/25 (68%) demonstrating sufficient knowledge. Interestingly, of the 11 adolescents with sufficient knowledge, 10/11 (91%) respective parents also had sufficient knowledge. Most adolescents and parents identified the gastroenterologist, another individual with CeD, and Google as helpful information sources. Adolescents also indicated their parents were a helpful information source. Conclusions While the study is still enrolling to reach sample size, we acknowledge that most adolescents in our study report being adherent to the GFD. However, their reported knowledge is variable, especially in knowing which foods are safe to eat. Thus, education should also focus as much on which foods to avoid, as well as safe foods to consume. Parent knowledge of the GFD may have a role in adolescent knowledge. At study completion, descriptive statistics will be used to examine participant characteristics and identify trends to assist in the development of future health education for adolescents with CeD. Funding Agencies Canadian Celiac Association - James A.Campbell Research Fund
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».