MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4213349336 · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1798/1/011001

Preface

2021· article· en· W4213349336 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPresentation (obstetrics)MechatronicsLibrary scienceEngineeringField (mathematics)Engineering ethicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMedicineMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

It is highly delighted to introduce the proceedings dedicated to the 2020 International Conference on Applied Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering (ICAMME 2020), which was successfully held on Sep. 25-27, 2020 in Hulun Buir, China, and hosted by AEIC Academic Exchange Information Centre. ICAMME 2020 is to bring together innovative academics and industrial experts in the field of applied mechanics, mechanical engineering, electrical and automation engineering to a common forum. The goal is to promote scientific information interchange between researchers, developers, engineers, students, and practitioners working all around the world. An ideal platform for seeking global partners had been established. About 60 participants from academic, high-education institutes and other organizations took part in the Conference. The conference model was divided into two sessions, including oral presentations and keynote speeches. In the first part, some scholars, whose submissions were selected as the excellent papers, were given 15 minutes to perform their oral presentations one by one. Then in the second part, keynote speakers were each allocated 30-45 minutes to hold their speeches. We were very honored to have Prof. Simon X. Yang from University of Guelph, Canada and Prof. Wei Min Huang from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore as our Chairman. In the keynote presentation part, we invited three professors as our keynote speakers. The first keynote speaker, Prof. Simon X. Yang, our beloved Chairman, shared a speech: Bioinspired Intelligent Approaches to Various Mechatronic Systems. In this talk, he started with a very brief introduction to biologically inspired computation and learning, and some bio-inspired computational techniques. After that, he presented several practical applications in engineering systems. The second keynote speaker, Prof. Wei Min Huang from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. He delivered a speech: Morphing Via Shape Memory Materials and Technology. In this talk, he presented a brief introduction of various shape memory phenomena firstly. After that, he showed a range of morphing applications in aero/space missions, biomedical devices etc. utilizing shape memory alloy and shape memory polymer. Our finale keynote speaker, Prof. Junxi Bi, from Inner Mongolia University of Technology, China shared a speech on Reliability Analysis and Optimization of Key Parts of Low Pressure Cantilever Casting Machine. The proceedings present a selection of high-quality papers submitted to the conference by researchers from universities, research institutes, and industry. All papers were subjected to peer-review by conference committee members and international reviewers. The papers were selected based on their quality and their relevance to the conference. The proceedings present recent advances in the fields of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering, Materials Science, Electrical and Automation Engineering and Other related research. I would like to express special gratitude to members of the conference committee and organizers of the conference. I would also like to thank the reviewers for their valuable time and advice which helped in improving the quality of the papers selected for presentation at the conference and for publication in the proceedings. Finally, I want to thank the authors, the members of the organizing committee, the reviewers, the chairpersons, sponsors, and all other conference participants for their support of ICAMME 2020. The Organizing Committee of ICAMME 2020 List of Committee member is available in this pdf.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,873
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,242

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesMême sujetStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisTravaux en français237 207