MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4214530781 · doi:10.1093/jacamr/dlac027

Presence of the narrow-spectrum OXA-1 β-lactamase enzyme is associated with elevated piperacillin/tazobactam MIC values among ESBL-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> clinical isolates (CANWARD, 2007–18)

2022· article· en· W4214530781 sur OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Walkty, James A. Karlowsky, Philippe Lagacé‐Wiens, Alyssa Golden, Melanie Baxter, Andrew Denisuik, Melissa McCracken, M. R. Mulvey, Heather J. Adam, George G. Zhanel

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAC-Antimicrobial Resistance · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Établissements canadiensPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of ManitobaManitoba Health
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of ManitobaSunovion
Mots-clésPiperacillin/tazobactamPiperacillinMicrobiologyEscherichia coliTazobactamBeta-lactamaseBeta-Lactamase InhibitorsAntibioticsChemistryBiologyBacteriaAntibiotic resistanceImipenemGeneGeneticsPseudomonas aeruginosa

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Piperacillin/tazobactam has been proposed as an alternative to carbapenems for the management of infections caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli.1 A recent randomized, controlled trial (MERINO study) that compared piperacillin/tazobactam to meropenem for the treatment of bacteraemia due to ceftriaxone non-susceptible E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae found an increase in 30 day mortality in the piperacillin/tazobactam arm.2 However, data from this trial and others suggest that the clinical outcome among patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam appears to depend, at least in part, on the MIC for this antimicrobial.3 The purpose of this study was to explore the association between the MIC of piperacillin/tazobactam and the presence of OXA-1 among ESBL-producing E. coli using a collection of isolates obtained from an ongoing national surveillance study in Canada (CANWARD). E. coli clinical isolates were obtained from patients admitted to or evaluated at sentinel hospitals across Canada (January 2007 to December 2018) as part of an ongoing national surveillance study (CANWARD).4 On an annual basis, each centre was asked to submit clinical isolates (consecutive, one per patient/infection site) from blood, respiratory, urine and wound infections. Isolate identification was performed by the submitting site and confirmed at the reference site as required. Isolates were shipped on Amies semi-solid transport media to the coordinating laboratory (Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Canada), subcultured onto appropriate media and stocked in skim milk at −80°C until MIC testing was carried out. Following two subcultures from frozen stock, the in vitro activity of piperacillin/tazobactam was determined by broth microdilution in accordance with the CLSI standards.5 In-house-prepared 96-well broth microdilution panels were used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Putative ESBL-producing E. coli were identified as isolates with a ceftriaxone and/or ceftazidime MIC of ≥1 mg/L. ESBL production was verified using the CLSI phenotypic confirmatory disc test.6 All phenotypically confirmed ESBL-producing isolates were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Quality control was performed using the FastQC tool (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) and contigs were assembled using SPAdes software.7 β-lactamase genes were identified using ResFinder 4.0 at an identity threshold of 90%.8 MLST alleles and STs were identified by scanning assembled contigs against available PubMLST databases (https://github.com/tseemann/mlst). In total, 671 ESBL-producing E. coli were identified as part of the CANWARD study, of which 62.4% (419/671) were ST131. The majority of isolates (92.0%; 617/671) harboured a CTX-M ESBL enzyme. CTX-M-15 (62.3%; 418/671), CTX-M-27 (13.9%; 93/671) and CTX-M-14 (13.4%; 90/671) were the most common variants identified. The narrow spectrum OXA-1 β-lactamase enzyme was present in 42.6% (286/671) of isolates. OXA-1 was detected in 66.3% (277/418) of isolates with a CTX-M-15 ESBL enzyme versus only 3.6% (9/253) of isolates with other ESBL enzyme types. The piperacillin/tazobactam MIC50 and MIC90 values were 8 mg/L and 32 mg/L for isolates that possessed the OXA-1 enzyme (modal MIC of 8 mg/L) versus 2 mg/L and 8 mg/L for those that did not (modal MIC of mg/L). The percentage of ESBL-producing E. coli that were inhibited by a piperacillin/tazobactam MIC of ≤8 mg/L (EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint)9 was 68.5% for isolates that were OXA-1 positive and 93.8% for isolates that were OXA-1 negative. Presence (n = 195) or absence (n = 476) of the narrow-spectrum TEM-1 enzyme did not appear to influence the association of OXA-1 with elevated MICs for piperacillin/tazobactam (Table 1). Piperacillin/tazobactam MIC distribution for ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates, stratified by the presence or absence of OXA-1 Data are shown as number of isolates (cumulative percentage of isolates). Piperacillin/tazobactam MIC distribution for ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates, stratified by the presence or absence of OXA-1 Data are shown as number of isolates (cumulative percentage of isolates). Henderson et al.3 recently investigated whether there was any association between the MIC of piperacillin/tazobactam and the presence of specific β-lactamase genes among isolates obtained from patients who participated in the MERINO trial. Of 143 ST131 E. coli, the modal piperacillin/tazobactam MIC was 8 mg/L for isolates harbouring CTX-M-15 and OXA-1 versus 2 mg/L for isolates harbouring only CTX-M-15.3 Livermore et al.10 assessed whether the presence of OXA-1 was associated with a reduction in piperacillin/tazobactam susceptibility among 293 ESBL-producing E. coli recovered from a bloodstream source of infection. Similar to our dataset, CTX-M-15 was the most common ESBL enzyme identified (present in 78.2% of isolates). The modal MIC for piperacillin/tazobactam was 8 or 16 mg/L (depending on the subgroup evaluated) for ESBL producers in the presence of OXA-1 versus 2 mg/L for ESBL producers in the absence of OXA-1.10 The results from these studies are largely in keeping with the data presented in this report. The association of OXA-1 with CTX-M-15 described here and elsewhere is particularly concerning given the widespread distribution of CTX-M ESBL enzymes worldwide.1,3,10 In summary, among a large collection of ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates obtained from patients at Canadian hospitals, the MIC50, MIC90 and modal MIC values of piperacillin/tazobactam were higher for the subset that harboured a narrow-spectrum OXA-1 β-lactamase enzyme relative to the subset that did not. The most important limitation of our study is that OXA-1 was infrequently detected in ESBL-producing E. coli that did not contain CTX-M-15. As many clinical microbiology laboratories use automated instruments for determination of piperacillin/tazobactam susceptibility, absence of OXA-1 by molecular testing may prove useful in further defining a subset of piperacillin/tazobactam susceptible ESBL-producing E. coli for which therapeutic use of this antimicrobial is most appropriate. We would like to thank the participating centres, investigators and laboratory site staff from the CANWARD sites for their continued support and cooperation. The CANWARD study was supported in part by the University of Manitoba, Shared Health Manitoba, PHAC-NML, Avir, Iterum, Merck, Paladin Labs, Sunovion and Verity. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this work.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,246
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations13
Publié2022
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueJAC-Antimicrobial ResistanceMême sujetAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaTravaux en français237 207