MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4214663833 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.4163.4163

An Phase 2 Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Oral Dexamethasone in Previously Untreated, Symptomatic Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

2015· article· en· W4214663833 sur OpenAlexaff
Christine I. Chen, Harminder Paul, Susi Snitzler, Lisa W. Le, Ellen Wei, Anthea Lau, James B. Johnston, Spencer B. Gibson, Michelle L. Queau, Suzanne Trudel

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensResearch Institute in Oncology and HematologyCancerCare ManitobaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLenalidomideMedicineDexamethasoneInternal medicineMultiple myelomaRegimenGastroenterologyTumor lysis syndromeThalidomideSurgeryOncologyChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Although lenalidomide, as an immunomodulatory agent, has anti-tumor activity in CLL, its use in this disease is complicated by tumor lysis (TLS) and tumor flare (TF), especially when used frontline. From our experience using low-dose lenalidomide (10mg daily), TLS can be prevented but TF remains frequent and few CRs are achieved (Chen et al. 2010). The current trial tests the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone, aiming to enhance anti-tumor activity through synergy and mitigation of toxicities such as TF, enabling escalation to higher doses of lenalidomide. We hypothesized that higher doses of lenalidomide with dexamethasone, given over a finite 18 cycles, may achieve deeper and more durable responses, without requiring long term continuous treatment. Final analysis of 31 patients is presented. Methods: Eligible patients had treatment-naïve, symptomatic CLL. The starting dose for lenalidomide was 5mg daily continuously, with 5mg escalations every 28 days to a maximum of 25 mg, and dexamethasone 12 mg daily orally days 1-7, 14, 21 of each 28 day cycle, both to a maximum of 18 cycles. Supportive measures: allopurinol for TLS prophylaxis, DVT prophylaxis with ASA, sulfatrim for pneumocystis prophylaxis. Results: Demographics: 31 pts were enrolled: median age 59 yrs (range 40-84), male 21 pts (68%), Rai stage III-IV 18 pts (58%), median peripheral lymphocytes 185 x109/L (range 9.3-509), β2M 4.1 mg/L (range 1.7-10.9); normal <3.2), bulky nodes 3 pts (10%), organomegaly 16 pts (52%). High risk features included: del17p/del11q on FISH in 6 pts (19%), ZAP70+ in 17 of 27 pts tested (63%) and unmutated IgVH in 16 of 26 pts tested (62%). All 31 pts received at least 1 cycle and were evaluable for toxicity and response. Hematologic toxicity: 19pts (61%) developed Gr 3-4 neutropenia during at least 1 cycle; 6 pts (19%) developed febrile neutropenia. Nine pts (29%) developed Gr 3-4 thrombocytopenia, without bleeding. Gr 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 14% and Gr 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 5% of the 431 cycles administered to all patients. Nonhematologic toxicity: Most common toxicities (all grades) included: non-desquamating rash (64%), diarrhea (61%), insomnia (55%), fatigue (52%), and edema (51%). Infections (all grades) were frequent (25 pts; 80%) but Grade 3-4 infections developed in only 4 pts (13%), including pneumonia (3 pts), and bacteremia (1 pt). Other common grade 3-4 toxicities included rash (3 pts), tumor flare (3 pts), abdominal pain (2 pts), and fatigue (2 pts). In contrast to the high rate of TF from our previous single-agent lenalidomide trial (88%), TF was considerably less common (9 pts; 29%). No TLS was noted. Dose modifications/study withdrawals: The median number of cycles received was 18 (range 1-18), with 58% completing protocol treatment. A median daily dose of 20mg (range 2.5-25mg) was reached. Dose reductions of lenalidomide were required in 14 pts (45%), most due to cytopenias. Reasons for early study discontinuation: toxicity (5 pts), patient withdrawal (5 pts), progressive disease (1 pt), and unrelated death (1 pt). Efficacy: All 31 pts achieved stable disease (SD) or better on study. Overall response rate was 74%: 21 PR (68%), 8 SD (26%), 2 CR (6%). Responses were reached at a median of 3.7 mos (range 0.8-13.7), though best response was not achieved until median 5 mos (range 0.8-25). At a median follow-up of 26 mos, 9 pts have progressed, only one during the treatment period. Duration of response was prolonged with greater depth of response: CR 28.6 mos, PR 17.9 mos, SD 4.6 mos. Median PFS was 27.8 months (95%CI: 22.1%-NA). The median OS has not been reached. Correlatives: Cereblon (CRBN) is a direct target of lenalidomide with expression required for anti-tumor activity. CRBN protein was detected by Western blot analysis in CD19-selected cells from screening blood samples of all 28 pts evaluated. Expression of CRBN substrates IKZF1 (Ikaros) and IKZF3 (Aiolos) pre and post-treatment and correlation with response and PFS are under evaluation and will be reported. Conclusion: Final results from this phase 2 study suggests that lenalidomide plus dexamethasone has significant activity in previously untreated CLL, is generally well-tolerated, and dramatically reduces the incidence of TF symptoms. This approach facilitates dose escalation beyond the 10mg daily dose used in our previous single agent study and achieves durable responses, without continuing therapy until progression. Disclosures Chen: Lundbeck: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide is not currently approved for use in CLL.. Trudel:BMS: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,843
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,285 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207