MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4214755756 · doi:10.1115/1.4023510

2012 Summer Bioengineering Conference Student Paper Competition

2013· article· en· W4214755756 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Biomechanical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueBiomedical and Engineering Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCompetition (biology)Library scienceEngineeringComputer scienceBiologyEcology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Bioengineering Division sponsors a Student Paper Competition at the annual Summer Bioengineering Conference (SBC). There are three competition levels: Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. There are also cash awards for the top three student papers in each level. The competition is divided into multiple technical areas to provide for a fair evaluation of student work. We are pleased to recognize the following awardees from the 2012 SBC.First Place: Jeffrey D. Hyypio, University of Minnesota, “A Microscale Collagen-Fibrin Interacting Network Model With Comparison To Experimental Results.”Second Place: Kelly M. Seymour, Elizabethtown College, “Computational Analysis of Microstructure of Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene for Total Joint Replacement.”Third Place: Bethany S. Powell, Valparaiso University, “The Effects of Shoe Architecture on Impact Forces During Gait: A Continuation Study.”First Place: David Schreier, University of Wisconsin “The Role of Collagen Synthesis in Ventricular and Vascular Adaptation to Hypoxic Pulmonary Hypertension.”Second Place: Joseph R. Dolensky, Georgia Tech, “The Effect of Pulmonary Hypertension on Tricuspid Valve Coaptation in Normal and Pathologic Valve Geometries: An in vitro Study.”Third Place: Daniel P. Brown, University of Pittsburgh, “The Effect of Anterior Dislocation on the Mechanical Properties of the Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament.”First Place: Stephanie Beeman, Virginia Tech, “Upper Body Kinematics of Relaxed Volunteers, Braced Volunteers, Hybrid III ATD, and PMHS in Low-Speed Frontal Sled Tests.”Second Place: Jason Miller, University of Washington, “Walking Mode Classification From Myoelectric and Inertial Fusion.”Third Place: Steven Boronyak, Vanderbilt University, “Biomechanical Effects of Radio Frequency Ablation With Simultaneous Cryogenic Anchoring.”First Place: Brianne K. Connizzo, University of Pennsylvania, “Altered Mechanical Properties and Fiber Realignment in Diabetic Mouse Supraspinatus and Achilles Tendons.”Second Place: Lauren Ferris, University of Kansas “A Performance Test to Assess Strategies to Transfer Weight During Knee Flexion and Extension With Rotation for Individuals With a Total Knee.”Third Place: Sarah Wohlman, Northwestern University, “A Biomechanical Model of the Thumb That Effectively Replicates Endpoint Forces Produced by Human Subjects and Measured in Anatomical Specimens.”First Place: Yasutaka Tobe, Waseda University “Investigation on a Relationship Between Hemodynamics and Wall-Thinning in an Unruptured Human Cerebral Aneurysm.”Second Place: Amy Silverstein, University of Pennsylvania, “Mesenchymal Stem Cell Morphology in a Fibrous Microenvironment With Length Scales Matching the Native Meniscus.”Third Place: Haijiao Liu, University of Toronto, “Characterization of the Elasticity of Valve Interstitial Cells on Soft Substrates Using Atomic Force Microscopy.”First Place: Christopher B. Arena, Virginia Tech/Wake Forest, “Phase Change Electrodes for Reducing Joule Heating During Irreversible Electroporation.”Second Place: Zhenpeng Qin, University of Minnesota, “Thermal Analysis Measurement of Gold Nanoparticle Interactions With Cell and Biomaterial.”Third Place: Thomas Claiborne, Stony Brook University, “Development and Optimization of a Novel Polymeric Prosthetic Heart Valve Using the Device Thrombogenicity Emulation Methodology.”First Place: Ian Campbell, Georgia Tech/Emory University, “Histology-Based, Lesion-Specific Modeling of Relative Stress Distributions Indicates Plaque Rupture Unlikely in Mice.”Second Place: Bahar Fata, University of Pittsburgh, “Regional Biomechanical and Microstructural Alterations of the Ovine Main Pulmonary Artery During Postnatal Growth.”Third Place: Lucas H. Ting, University of Washington, “Hemodynamic Shear Regulates Intercellular Forces and Permeability of Endothelial Cell Monolayers.”First Place: Christopher S. Szot, Virginia Tech/Wake Forest, “Characterizing the Phenotypic Response of Endothelial Cells Cultured on Proangiogenic in vitro Tumor Mimics.”Second Place: Bryce Whited, Virginia Tech, “A Nondestructive Fiber-Based Imaging System to Assess Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts.”Third Place: Véronique Peiffer, Imperial College London, “Age-Related Differences in Hemodynamics of the Rabbit Aorta and Comparison With Average Maps of Atherosclerotic Lesion Prevalence.”First Place: Sevan R. Oungoulian, Columbia University, “Articular Cartilage Wear Characterization With a Particle Sizing and Counting Analyzer.”Second Place: Andrew Meyer, University of Florida, “Evaluation of a Novel Statistical Method for EMG-to-Moment Estimation During Gait.”Third Place: Ryan Koppes, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, “Transient and Steady-State Force Enhancement in the Drosophila Jump Muscle.”First Place: Baptiste Coudrillier, Johns Hopkins University, “Effects of the Scleral Collagen Structure on the Biomechanical Response of the Optic Nerve Head.”Second Place: Michael Fernandez, Columbia University, “Direct Measurement of Human Cervical Tissue Permeability.”Third Place: Stefaan W. Verbruggen, National University of Ireland, Galway, “Loading-Induced Interstitial Fluid Flow in Bone Mechanobiology: An FSI Approach to the Osteocyte Environment.”First Place: Erik H. Clayton, Washington University-St. Louis, “Viscoelastic Properties of Living Human Brain by Local Frequency Estimation Applied to Distortional Wave Fields.”Second Place: Mohammad F. Hadi, University of Minnesota, “Microscale Fiber Network Structure Affects the Simulated Macroscale Failure of Collagen Gel Tissue Analogs.”Third Place: Sudhir Khetan, University of Pennsylvania, “Stem Cell Fate Within 3D Hydogels is Mediated by Network Structure-Dependent Traction Generation.”

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,474
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,751

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,003
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,001
Communication savante0,0130,003
Science ouverte0,0030,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4740,344

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Biomechanical EngineeringMême sujetBiomedical and Engineering EducationTravaux en français237 207