Establishing Prognostic DNA Methylation-Based Chordoma Subgroups in Tissue that are Detectable in Plasma
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective: Chordomas are bony tumors of skull base and spine that make up 2 to 4% of aggressive primary bone cancers. Despite standard of care treatment with surgery and radiotherapy, around half of patients recur, experience further neurological morbidity, and die within 4 years while the remaining half survive over 10 to 20 years. Unfortunately, these clinically aggressive and clinically benign subsets of chordoma cannot be reliably identified using existing clinical, pathological, or molecular factors/features to guide treatment approaches. Accordingly, this work aims to identify prognostic DNA methylation-based subgroups of chordomas and to establish feasibility for subgroup identification noninvasively, so that patients may be prognosticated at the time of diagnosis to guide treatment decisions. Methods: A multi-institutional 20-year surgical series of 68 patients was identified with available chordoma tissue samples. Extracted, bisulfite-converted DNA from tissue samples underwent whole genome DNA methylation profiling on the Illumina EPIC array. Matched plasma samples underwent sequencing of methylated cell-free circulating tumor DNA where available. Publicly available chordoma methylation and RNAseq datasets were obtained for validation. Results: The 68 chordoma tissue samples underwent consensus clustering which identified two stable patient clusters ([ Fig. 1 ]). Cluster 1 had a statistically significant poorer disease-specific survival than cluster 2 ([ Fig. 2 ]: median 6.0 vs. 17.3 years, p = 0.0062). The prognostic utility of these methylation-based clusters (HR = 14.2, 95% CI: 2.1–94.8, p = 0.0063) was independent of that of extent of resection and adjuvant radiotherapy use in a multivariate Cox's analysis, all three of which were independently prognostic. Cluster 1 was labeled as the “Immune-infiltrated” subtype based on the identification of immune-related pathways with genes hypomethylated at promoters in this cluster along with increased immune cell abundance ([ Fig. 3A ]). Comparatively, cluster 2 was characterized as the “Cellular” subtype based on the identification cell-to-cell interaction plus extracellular matrix pathway hypomethylation and higher tumor cellularity ([ Fig. 3B ]). These characterizations were validated using external DNA methylation data to show similar clusters, in external RNAseq data to show increased gene expression in the hypomethylated pathways for each cluster, and with immunohistochemical staining of immune markers. Differentially methylated regions of the genome in the plasma methylome data were identified that accurately distinguished chordomas from other clinical differential diagnoses by applying fifty chordoma-versus-other binomial generalized linear models in random 20% testing sets ([ Fig. 4A ]: mean AUROC = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.52–1.00). Tissue-based and plasma-based methylation signals were highly correlated and leave-one-out models accurately classified all tumors into their correct cluster using plasma methylome data ([ Fig. 4B ]). Three clinical cases of chordomas accurately diagnosed noninvasively, after alternate nonchordoma diagnoses were made clinically using MR imaging, are reported. Conclusion: This work is the first to establish prognostic DNA methylation-based subtypes of chordoma and to utilize plasma methylomes as noninvasive biomarkers for chordoma diagnosis and prognostication. The ability to identify and subtype chordomas prior to treatment will allow for therapy aggressiveness, including extent of resection, to be tailored to patient prognosis to improve clinical outcomes. Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Publication History Article published online: 15 February 2022 © 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».