MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4214946716 · doi:10.1242/jeb.243445

How summer sleepers stave off desiccation

2022· article· en· W4214946716 sur OpenAlexaff
Andrea Murillo

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiquePhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAestivationCreaturesEcologyBurrowDesiccationTorporBiologyFossorialGeographyThermoregulationArchaeologyNatural (archaeology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Have you ever left your house on a sweltering day and immediately gone back inside because it is too hot to even think? Not all creatures have the luxury of escaping torrid heat, so some have found ways to survive even when their homes become as dry as a bone. They can either deal with water shortages and scorching temperatures or use a hibernation-like ‘summer sleep’ called aestivation, when they become inactive and shut off most biological processes except those necessary for survival. Aestivating animals such as earthworms can alter which genes they turn off and on to survive until the rains return. These stoic burrowers are also true unsung heroes in our battle against the effects of climate change because they help store carbon in the ground and help other smaller animals by providing shelter while they undergo aestivation. Since scientists predict climate change will increase the number of droughts, figuring out how these climate change mitigators aestivate during an exceptionally dry summer is critical. Natasha Tilikj and Marta Novo from the Complutense University of Madrid, Spain, investigated which genes earthworms (Carpetania matritensis) from the Iberian Peninsula activate and switch off during aestivation.The duo collected earthworms from El Molar, Spain, and returned with them to the lab. Once there, the team needed the right soil conditions to produce both active and aestivating worms – when they tie themselves into mucus-covered knots – to compare the two. To reproduce the correct conditions, they placed some worms in dry soil to encourage them to begin aestivating and maintained the remaining worms in moist soil to keep them active. After a month, the team checked whether or not the worms were aestivating and then analyzed how the animals changed the patterns of gene expression – which genes they upregulated and which they downregulated – after slipping into a summer sleep.Unsurprisingly, the team found that the aestivating worms reduced expression of most genes. Other aestivating animals conserve energy by destroying and producing fewer proteins, to extend their state of suspended animation until conditions improve, and worms could be using the same strategy. The aestivating worms reduced expression of genes involved in the production of proteins and other macromolecules in addition to genes involved in protein breakdown and digestion. As worms go into this state of dormancy, they shut down processes that are not vital for survival. The team also found evidence that the worms were under stress and increased the levels of toxic oxygen by-products, known as reactive oxygen species, which can damage DNA after aestivation. In addition, there was an increase in the expression of genes that typically help combat and repair the DNA damage caused by these harmful products, and the stress experienced by the worms also activated the worms’ immune response for protection from possible infection.Finally, the team discovered that aestivating worms may stave off water loss using an innovative mechanism that researchers have yet to study in earthworms: the worms increased the expression of genes involved in the production of the amino acid arginine. The duo suggest that an increase in arginine, or a build-up of nitrogenous waste, might reduce the amount of water lost by the worms.Aestivating earthworms employ various strategies to survive desiccation. With increasing drought in the future, whether these protective mechanisms will be sufficient is unknown. The researchers recommend further investigation into the role of digestion, excretion and the central nervous system in aestivation to help scientists design better drought mitigation strategies to protect these uncelebrated champions of the subterranean world.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,029

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Experimental Biology→Même sujetPhysiological and biochemical adaptations→Travaux en français237 207→