Autoantibodies and COVID-19: 
Rediscovering Nonspecific Polyclonal B-Cell Activation?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor—In the search to explain advanced, prolonged, or post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease, several investigative groups, including that of Acosta-Ampudia et al, have found presumed autoantibody activities, which at times have been linked to accentuated proinflammatory states or possible autoimmunity [1]. The mere association of coincident elevations of such antibodies or their intermediate-term persistence have tempted several hypotheses of pathogenesis, whether for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection directly or concomitant immunologically based phenomena. While it is certainly appropriate to focus on these findings as being coronavirus specific, are we only rediscovering nonspecific polyclonal B-cell activation? The concept of nonspecific polyclonal B-cell activation and, hence, nonspecific antibody production, has been well known for nearly a half century [2–4]. Whether for acute or persistent infections, a wide variety of autoantibodies, usually immunoglobulin G (IgG) subsets having low specificity, may develop to bind nonspecific antimicrobial or self-antigens. Among the latter are autoantibodies to cytokines, classic connective tissue disease autoantigens, and many other but variable host targets. Most of these nonspecific responses either markedly diminish or disappear over time. Such timing may span weeks to well over 1 year. The transient development of autoantibodies such as rheumatoid factor or cold agglutinins during acute Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections remains a classic example of such nonspecificity [5]. That a similar antibody production would arise with coronaviruses was heralded in the study of murine hepatitis virus [6]. Even more recent studies illustrate how such nonspecific events can follow many non–SARS-CoV-2 infections or vaccination ([7], Feng et al, unpublished). What has not been resolved, however, is whether these immune activations represent purposeful innate immunity tactics or aberrations supporting the microbial pathogen’s disease process or, perhaps, neither. Yet unresolved is the extent, if any, that such a B-cell cascade truly induces an autoantibody with definitive and/or long-lasting immune dysfunction. Theories of detrimental postinfection immunopathology abound for COVID-19. For example, common thrombotic events during infection, or rare ones after some vaccinations, have largely stimulated reconsideration of infection-associated antiphospholipid antibodies [8]. In the short term, and with the desire to better understand the complexity of an impactful pandemic, it is more common to assume that COVID-19–associated autoantibody production should somehow factor into either early and/or late disease. We must concede, however, that a mere attribution of autoantibody existence to functional autoimmune disease, including interinfection cytokine storm or advanced inflammatory states, may just be a rudimentary and/or preliminary association, as the nonspecific polyclonal B-cell activations that we have experienced with other infections and for which we continue to seek answers. For some patients, the finding of autoantibodies during active COVID-19 has the potential to bias the treating physician towards an assumption that the two are pathologically linked and, hence, may potentially elicit intervention. Just as unproven antiviral treatments may jeopardize patient status, so too may the assumptions that any such autoantibody may truly have a role in the disease course. Potential conflicts of interest. The author certifies no potential conflicts of interest. The author has submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,034 | 0,018 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».