From Perylene Diimide Polymers to <scp>Fused‐Ring</scp> Electron Acceptors: A <scp>15‐Year</scp> Exploration Journey of Nonfullerene Acceptors
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Comprehensive Summary Fullerene derivatives are classic electron acceptor materials for organic solar cells (OSCs) but possess some intrinsic drawbacks such as weak visible light absorption, limited optoelectronic property tunability, difficult purification and photochemical/morphological instability. Fullerene acceptors are a bottleneck restricting further development of this field. Our group pioneered the exploration of novel nonfullerene acceptors in China in 2006, and initiated the research of two representative acceptor systems, rylene diimide polymer and fused‐ring electron acceptor (FREA). FREA breaks the theoretical efficiency limit of fullerene‐based OSCs (~13%) and promotes the whole field to an unprecedented prosperity with efficiency of 20%, heralding a nonfullerene era for OSCs. In this review, we revisit 15‐year nonfullerene exploration journey, summarize the design principles, molecular engineering strategies, physical mechanisms and device applications of these two nonfullerene acceptor systems, and propose some possible research topics in the near future. What is the most favorite and original chemistry developed in your research group? Fused‐ring electron acceptor for photovoltaics. How do you get into this specific field? Could you please share some experiences with our readers? In 2006 when I came back to ICCAS from USA and started my independent academic career, I was interested in organic photovoltaics (OPV) which I had never touched before since I believed it is useful and should have a bright future. OPV converts renewable solar energy to clean electricity through photovoltaic effect. The active layer in OPV device consists of electron donor and electron acceptor. Although fullerenes were prevailing acceptor materials in OPV at that time, I doubted if this choice is correct considering their fatal flaws such as weak absorption. I was curious about why no research groups in China explored fullerene alternatives before 2006. In 2006 our group initiated the nonfullerene OPV research of China. In 2015 we invented the milestone molecule ITIC and pioneered fused‐ring electron acceptor (FREA). Around 300 research groups in >20 countries have utilized the FREA to fabricate high‐efficiency OPV devices with champion efficiency of >20%. The FREA has subverted previously predominant fullerenes, and is inaugurating a new era of the OPV field. How do you supervise your students? I expect that my students should have some essential personalities such as curiosity, creativity, devotion, persistence and diligence. I encourage them to do original, unique and leading research. I endow them with cheerful academic atmosphere such as self‐motivation, open‐mindedness and cross‐cooperation. I would like to provide them with warm human solicitude when they need help or suffer from bitterness. What is the most important personality for scientific research? Curiosity; uniqueness; persistence.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».