MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4220775282 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p1-18-29

Abstract P1-18-29: Male patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) receiving palbociclib in the real-world: patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes from the POLARIS study

2022· article· en· W4220775282 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joanne L. Blum, Caroline DiCristo, David J. Gordon, Meghan Karuturi, D. Oubre, Erin Jepsen, Juan Carlos Cuevas, Shailendra Lakhanpal, Zhe Zhang, Yao Wang, Debu Tripathy

Notice bibliographique

RevueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPalbociclibMedicineFulvestrantInternal medicineBreast cancerOncologyCancerNeutropeniaMetastatic breast cancerTamoxifenGynecologyChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Although male breast cancer accounts for <1% of all breast cancer diagnoses, its incidence is increasing. Palbociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant is indicated for treating HR+/HER2- ABC in men. Adding to a previous analysis describing real-world patient characteristics and treatment patterns in men with HR+/HER2- ABC, this analysis describes additional patient characteristics, study site characteristics, and preliminary tumor response data in male patients enrolled in the POLARIS study. Methods: POLARIS is a prospective, noninterventional real-world study of patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who received palbociclib as deemed appropriate by a physician; the targeted enrollment is 1500 patients from approximately 110 US and Canadian sites. Patient and study site data were collected from the treating physicians’ routine clinical assessments (eg, patient medical charts, surveys, site questionnaires). Real-world tumor response was determined based on the treating physicians’ assessments of imaging results and clinical progression. Results: As of December 17, 2020, 15 men were enrolled across 12 US sites; most were community-based sites (75%; Table 1) and most physicians (58.3%) had been treating patients with ABC for 11-20 years. The median age of patients was 66 years, 46.7% of patients had visceral disease, and 41.7% had bone-only disease. Seven patients received palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor, 7 patients received palbociclib plus fulvestrant, and 1 patient received palbociclib plus tamoxifen. Two patients initiated palbociclib treatment at 100 mg due to comorbidities. Five patients had ≥1 comorbidity (ie, anemia, neutropenia, cellulitis, myocardial infarction, hypertension, neoplasm, or cerebrovascular disorder). All patients received ≥1 concomitant medications (Table 2). Medications commonly received included antihyperglycemics (53.3%), antidepressants (46.7%), opioids (40.0%), antihyperlipidemics (26.7%), and antithrombotics (26.7%). Among all 15 patients, 1 had a best tumor response of complete response (CR) and 4 patients had a partial response (PR), as reported by the physician. Among patients who received palbociclib in the first-line setting (n=9), 1 had a CR and 3 had a PR, as reported by the physician. Conclusions: These findings add to the current knowledge of the male patient population enrolled in the POLARIS study and provide preliminary information on clinical outcomes. This population represents a real-world patient cohort with a heavy disease burden. Although longer follow-up of this patient cohort is warranted, these results continue to support palbociclib as a treatment for men with HR+/HER2- ABC. Pfizer (NCT03280303). Table 1.US Study Site CharacteristicsSite characteristicSites (N=12), n (%)Geographic locationSouth8 (66.7)Midwest3 (25.0)West1 (8.3)Site categoryCommunity9 (75.0)Academic1 (8.3)Other2 (16.7)Number of treating physicians at the practice*Median (range)12 (3-30)Distribution1-104 (33.3)11-205 (41.7)21-302 (16.7)Not reported1 (8.3)Number of breast cancer cases treated annually†Median (range)350 (50, 3000)Distribution50-1502 (16.7)>1508 (66.7)Not reported2 (16.7)Number of HR+/HER2- A/MBC cases treated annually†Median (range)100 (20, 600)Distribution<503 (25.0)50-1503 (25.0)>1504 (33.3)Missing2 (16.7)Use of clinical pathwaysYes7 (58.3)No5 (41.7)A/MBC=advanced/metastatic breast cancer. *Data missing for 1 site; †data missing for 2 sites. Table 2.Documented Concomitant Medications Received in >10% of Patients*MedicationPatients (N=15), n (%)Antihyperglycemics8 (53.3)Metformin4 (26.7)Glimepiride2 (13.3)Antidepressants7 (46.7)Anxiolytics7 (46.7)Alprazolam4 (26.7)Buspirone2 (13.3)Vitamin A and D, including combinations6 (40.0)Cholecalciferol6 (40.0)Opioids6 (40.0)Procet2 (13.3)Calcium3 (20.0)Other analgesics and antipyretics6 (40.0)Paracetamol3 (20.0)Antiemetics and antinauseants5 (33.3)Prochlorperazine3 (20.0)Ondansetron2 (13.3)Antihyperlipidemics4 (26.7)Atorvastatin2 (13.3)Antithrombotics4 (26.7)Rivaroxaban2 (13.3)Peptic ulcer and GORD medications4 (26.7)Pantoprazole2 (13.3)Thyroid medications3 (20.0)Levothyroxine3 (20.0)Angiotensin II receptor blockers3 (20.0)Losartan3 (20.0)ACE inhibitors2 (13.3)Lisinopril2 (13.3)Low-ceiling diuretics, thiazides2 (13.3)Hydrochlorothiazide2 (13.3)High-ceiling diuretics2 (13.3)Furosemide2 (13.3)Vitamin B12 and folic acid2 (13.3)Cyanocobalamin2 (13.3)Hypnotics and sedatives2 (13.3)Zolpidem2 (13.3)ACE=angiotensin-converting enzyme; GORD=gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.*Specific medications received by >10% of patients; information is entered voluntarily and is subject to missing data. This list is not exhaustive. Citation Format: Joanne Blum, Caroline DiCristo, David Gordon, Meghan Karuturi, David Oubre, Erin Jepsen, Juan Cuevas, Shailendra Lakhanpal, Zhe Zhang, Yao Wang, Debu Tripathy. Male patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) receiving palbociclib in the real-world: patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes from the POLARIS study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-29.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,078
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,359
Écart entre enseignants0,321 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCancer ResearchMême sujetAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesTravaux en français237 207