I Early child development: Silent emergency or unique opportunity?
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<h3></h3> The early years of life represent a critical window of opportunity for a child’s development, a time when the brain is most sensitive to external influences. Early childhood is not only a period of special sensitivity to risk factors, but also a critical time when the benefits of early interventions are amplified, and the negative effects of risk can be reduced. This is underscored by the evidence from neuroscience<sup>1</sup> which emphasizes the importance of nurturing care (adequate health, nutrition, responsive care, opportunities for learning and protection from harm and abuse) to all young children to enable them to reach their full potential. The first 1,000 days of life shape a child’s future. Nurturing care plays a vital role in giving children the best possible start in life: the mantra ‘Eat, Play, Love’<sup>2</sup> summarizes the need for opportunities in the environment of the young child for adequate nutrition, opportunities for play and safety and security. This brain architecture is a critical foundation for all future learning, behaviour and health. And while neural connections continue into adulthood, how these early connections form determine whether later connections have strong or weak foundations. As demonstrated by Heckman,<sup>3</sup> the smartest investments in human development are those done earliest in the lifespan, as returns to ECD investments are considerably higher compared to equivalent investments in the later years – primary school, secondary school and after. The healthy development of a baby’s brain depends on nurturing care, which benefits children, but it also about the knowledge and resources their families and other caregivers require to provide it. It refers to the enabling conditions created by public policies, programmes and services to ensure children’s good health and nutrition, protect them from threats and give them opportunities for early learning, through interactions that are responsive and emotionally supportive. To support the development of their children, parents need time, resources, and services. This is made available through a) enhanced enabling (policy) environments; b) integrated services (for example frontline workers including health, social work, education nutrition); c) knowledge and agency for caregivers and parents such as tools, guidance, masterclasses and information; d) financial support and resources including financial literacy, child benefits, cash transfers and e) amplification of caregivers’ voices through social and digital media, parenting voices in community and policy platforms. While the Covid-19 pandemic exacerbated the crisis of care and learning, it has also provided an opportunity to elevate the needs for parenting and family support and care. To continue to promote ECD services and interventions and ensure that every child is enabled to not only survive but thrive we must strengthen formative research models and enhance implementation research on ECD; leverage existing routine touchpoints to elevate the importance of holistic ECD; invest in system strengthening and capacity building of frontline health workers through innovative tools; raise awareness and partners including with parents and caregivers themselves to ensure child health and development; enhance direct support to parents through community engagement initiatives; and, empower policy makers and key stakeholders with the latest evidence and advocate for enhanced investments in ECD and parenting support programmes. <h3>References</h3> Advancing Early Childhood Development: from Science to Scale (thelancet.com): https://www.thelancet.com/series/ECD2016. Early Moments Matter | UNICEF: https://www.unicef.org/early-moments The Heckman Curve – The Heckman Equation: https://heckmanequation.org/resource/the-heckman-curve
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle