563 Fire safety in homeless encampments
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction It is well known that people experiencing homelessness are at a greater risk for burn injury. Our burn centre saw an increase in admissions of homeless individuals during the pandemic. Typically, we partner with our hospital’s communications staff to share burn prevention public service announcements. But our usual method of broadcasting information through media like newspapers, blog posts, Facebook, or Instagram was not necessarily going to reach people sleeping rough. This report describes the development of a partnership between a burn centre, outreach workers, and people with lived experience of homelessness to improve fire safety in encampments. Methods Our goal was to create a Fire Safety Manual and hold Fire Safety Training Sessions. We conducted surveys that asked encampment residents questions like, “What do you use fires for?” “What fire hazards do you see at encampments?” and “How do you think fires could best be prevented?”. We used the results of this survey to guide the training manual and held workshops to engage encampment residents and incorporate feedback into the manual. Results The manual uses harm reductions strategies and focuses on real-life situations encountered by folks living outdoors—the manual outlines how to safely start a fire and what to do if a fire occurs. The reality is that people are trying to survive freezing winters while sleeping outside; this means that some safety standards are not possible, and the guide had to reflect that. For example, we practiced fire escape plans during training sessions and had to think about obstacles like tents with only one way out. A solution was to keep a utility knife inside and outside the tent in case one had to cut through to escape or free someone. An encampment resident suggested hiding the knives so they would not be used as weapons. We purchased fire extinguishers, fire blankets, and first aid kits that we distributed during training. Conclusions Education is critical to prevent burn injuries. Burn centre staff may be experts on burn prevention, but we are not experts on surviving outside. We have to be accountable to this community. This means listening, building trust, and partnering with people living outdoors. People who did training sessions were empowered to start fire brigades in their encampments. Crucial concepts are to meet people where they are and always to include people with lived experience: “Nothing about us without us.”
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».