551 Age Does Not Predict Admission Culture Positivity
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Burn patients are susceptible to wound infections, urinary tract infections, pneumonia, and bloodstream infections. With rising rates of community colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO), the colonization of wounds with commensal organisms is more concerning than ever, which is particularly true in patients with recent hospital admissions, advanced age, or institutional living situations. The purpose of this study was to examine if age was a factor in obtaining admission cultures and if older patients were more likely to have positive cultures. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted involving burn patients admitted at three ABA verified burn centers from January 2016 - December 2017. Data collected included demographics, burn injury, and cultures obtained within 24 hours of admission. Patients were divided into 10-year age increments from 20 to ≥ 80 years old. Data analysis was conducted using Chi-square, Fisher Exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results A total of 1615 patients (mean age 45.9± 17.7 years, 1145 males (70.9%), mean burn size (TBSA) 9.6± 14.2%) were analyzed. Admission cultures obtained were: 656 (40.6%) wound cultures, 196 (12.1%) urine cultures, 139 (8.6%) blood cultures, and 1445 (89.5%) Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) screen. In all age groups, there were no significant differences between patients who had wound cultures (p = 0.97), blood cultures (p = 0.39), or MRSA screening (p = 0.9). As patients aged, they were more likely to have urine cultures obtained (p=0.01); - 23% of patients >80 years old had urine cultures ordered at admission compared to 8.6-16.9% of younger patients. Positive results by age group: wound cultures (p= 0.09), urine cultures (p= 0.16), blood cultures (0.10), MRSA screen (p=0.98). In looking at increased exposure to MDROs prior to admission by age groups, patients in the 61–70year (8.33%), 71–80-year (5.68%), and >80-year (6.67%) age groups were more likely to have a recent (within 30 days) hospitalization (p = 0.02), but there was no significant difference in pre-hospital institutionalization (i.e., prison, skilled nursing facility) by age group (p = 0.06). With a recent hospitalization, MRSA screening was more likely to be positive (11.3% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.05). Conclusions All burn patients are susceptible to infections. Urine cultures were more likely to be obtained in older burn injured patients who are 80 years of age or older. There was no significant difference in culture positivity by age. Apart from MRSA screen positivity, there was no increased risk of urine, wound, or blood culture positivity with recent hospitalization or institutionalization. The utility of screening all patients for MDROs on admission should be considered for patients 20 years of age and older.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».