Moderators of the Relationship Between Pain and Pain-Related Sexual Disability in Women with Provoked Vestibulodynia Symptoms
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated the deleterious effects of pain anxiety (ie, the degree to which one fears pain), stress, and solicitous partner responses (ie, expressions of sympathy and attention to one's partner's pain) on pain and pain-related disability, but little is known about whether these variables moderate the robust pain-pain-related disability relationship in individuals with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). AIM: We investigated whether pain anxiety, stress, and solicitous partner responses moderated the relationship between penetrative pain and pain-related sexual disability in women with PVD symptoms. METHODS: Participants with PVD symptoms (N = 65, age range = 18-73 years) completed an online survey assessing pain anxiety (Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale), solicitous partner responses (WHYMPI Solicitous Responses Scale), penetrative pain (Female Sexual Function Index), and pain-related sexual disability (Pain Disability Index). Moderated regression analyses were performed using pain anxiety, stress, and solicitous partner responses as moderators of the relationship between penetrative pain, and pain-related sexual disability. OUTCOMES: Outcomes in the current study included the moderating effect of pain anxiety, perceived stress, and solicitous partner responses on the relationship between penetrative genital pain and pain-related disability in sexual behavior. RESULTS: Higher genital pain from penetrative intercourse and higher pain anxiety significantly predicted higher pain-related sexual disability, but perceived stress was not significantly related to sexual disability. Solicitous partner responses were significantly positively correlated with pain-related sexual disability. None of the moderators significantly moderated the pain-pain-related sexual disability relationship. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: For women with PVD, pain anxiety and solicitous partner responses to their pain may exacerbate their pain-related sexual disability, signifying that pain anxiety and solicitous partner responses represent important targets of therapeutic intervention for women with PVD. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The present study extended past research on the relationships between psychological and behavioral factors and pain in women with PVD symptoms by demonstrating the deleterious relationship between pain anxiety, solicitous responses, and pain-related sexual disability. However, the study was correlational in nature, which precludes conclusions about the effect of pain anxiety, and solicitous partner responses on pain-related sexual disability. CONCLUSION: High pain anxiety and frequent solicitous partner responses to an individual's pain predicted higher pain-related sexual disability, suggesting that it may be possible to improve the quality of life of PVD sufferers through interventions that aim to decrease pain anxiety, and solicitous partner responses, in addition to interventions that aim to decrease pain per se. Maunder L, Dargie E, Pukall C. Moderators of the Relationship Between Pain and Pain-Related Sexual Disability in Women with Provoked Vestibulodynia Symptoms. J Sex Med 2022;19:809-822.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».