A Digital Screening System for Alzheimer Disease Based on a Neuropsychological Test and a Convolutional Neural Network: System Development and Validation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer disease (AD) and other types of dementia are now considered one of the world's most pressing health problems for aging people worldwide. It was the seventh-leading cause of death, globally, in 2019. With a growing number of patients with dementia and increasing costs for treatment and care, early detection of the disease at the stage of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) will prevent the rapid progression of dementia. In addition to reducing the physical and psychological stress of patients' caregivers in the long term, it will also improve the everyday quality of life of patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to design a digital screening system to discriminate between patients with MCI and AD and healthy controls (HCs), based on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) neuropsychological test. METHODS: The study took place at National Taiwan University between 2018 and 2019. In order to develop the system, pretraining was performed using, and features were extracted from, an open sketch data set using a data-driven deep learning approach through a convolutional neural network. Later, the learned features were transferred to our collected data set to further train the classifier. The first data set was collected using pen and paper for the traditional method. The second data set used a tablet and smart pen for data collection. The system's performance was then evaluated using the data sets. RESULTS: The performance of the designed system when using the data set that was collected using the traditional pen and paper method resulted in a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.913 (SD 0.004) when distinguishing between patients with MCI and HCs. On the other hand, when discriminating between patients with AD and HCs, the mean AUROC was 0.950 (SD 0.003) when using the data set that was collected using the digitalized method. CONCLUSIONS: The automatic ROCF test scoring system that we designed showed satisfying results for differentiating between patients with AD and MCI and HCs. Comparatively, our proposed network architecture provided better performance than our previous work, which did not include data augmentation and dropout techniques. In addition, it also performed better than other existing network architectures, such as AlexNet and Sketch-a-Net, with transfer learning techniques. The proposed system can be incorporated with other tests to assist clinicians in the early diagnosis of AD and to reduce the physical and mental burden on patients' family and friends.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».