Artificial-Intelligence Based Horizontal Well Placement Optimization Leveraging Geological and Engineering Attributes, and Expert-Based Workflows
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Horizontal wells provide a highly efficient way to maximize contact with the reservoir target and to increase overall recovery by allowing a larger drainage pattern. Traditionally, the identification of optimal horizontal well locations involves domain expertise across multiple disciplines and takes a long time to complete. In this work, a fully streamlined artificial intelligence (AI)-based workflow is introduced to facilitate horizontal opportunity identification by combining geological and engineering attributes in all types of reservoirs. This workflow relies on automated geologic and engineering workflows to map the remaining oil in place and identify areas with high probability of success (POS) and high productivity potential. Advanced computational algorithms are implemented under a variety of physical constraints to identify best segments for placing the wellbores. Statistical and machine learning techniques are combined to assess neighborhood performance and geologic risks, along with forecasting the future production performance of the proposed targets. Finally, a comprehensive vetting and sorting framework is presented to ensure the final set of identified opportunities are feasible for the field development plan. The workflow incorporates multiple configuration and trajectory constraints for the horizontal wells’ placement, such as length/azimuth/inclination range, zone-crossing, fault-avoidance, etc. The optimization engine is initialized with an ensemble of initial guesses generated with Latin-Hypercube Sampling (LHS) to ensure all regions of good POS distribution in the model are evenly considered. The intelligent mapping between discrete grid indexing and continuous spatial coordinates greatly reduced the timing and computational resources required for the optimization, thus enabling a fast determination of target segments for multi- million-cell models. The optimization algorithm identifies potential target locations with 3D pay tracking globally, and the segments are further optimized using an interference analysis that selects the best set of non-interfering targets to maximize production. This framework has been successfully applied to multiple giant mature assets in the Middle East, North and South America, with massive dataset and complexity, and in situations where static and dynamic reservoir models are unavailable, partially available, or are out of date. In the specific case study presented here, the workflow is applied to a giant field in the Middle East where tens of deviated or horizontal opportunities are initially identified and vetted. The methodology presented turns the traditional labor-intensive task of horizontal target identification into an intelligently automated workflow with high accuracy. The implemented optimization engine, along with other features highlighted within, has enabled a lightning-fast, highly customizable workflow to identify initial opportunity inventory under high geological complexity and massive dataset across different disciplines. Furthermore, the data-driven core algorithm minimizes human biases and subjectivity and allows for repeatable analysis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».