MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4221091440 · doi:10.1093/bjs/znac113

Patient stress due to surgery postponement in a tertiary referral centre transformed to a COVID-19 hospital

2022· article· en· W4221091440 sur OpenAlexaff
Paulina Moctezuma‐Velázquez, Carlos A. González-Martínez, Gabriela Alejandra Buerba, Miriam Serment, Carlos Moctezuma‐Velázquez

Notice bibliographique

RevueBritish journal of surgery · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEnhanced Recovery After Surgery
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMEDLINEIntensive care medicineGeneral surgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear Editor At the beginning of 2021, all surgical procedures were cancelled at this institution without foreseeing the health and emotional consequences1. Even though guidelines recommended that cancer surgery should not be cancelled, this was not possible here2. It is estimated that more than 28 404 603 operations were cancelled worldwide, of which one-third were related to malignancy3. The stress caused to patients has not yet been fully characterized so was studied here. Consenting patients whose surgery was cancelled owing to the COVID-19 pandemic between April 2020 and August 2020 were assessed using the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) described by Sanz-Carrillo and colleagues4. The institutional ethics committee approved the project. Two intervals were evaluated: general stress, described as a time lap 2 years before the event (before the surgery was cancelled), and recent stress (after the surgery had been cancelled). The mean(s.d.) of the total score obtained for general stress and recent stress were transformed into an index as described by Levenstein and co-workers5. Demographic variables were gathered, and the correlation between sex, age and PSQ score was evaluated by means of the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The paired t test was used for evaluation of continuous variables and McNemar’s test for categorical variables. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata® release 14 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). A total of 70 patients were included; 33 per cent were male patients, 61 per cent lived in Mexico City, and 40 per cent had a job, whereas 54 per cent were unemployed or retired. Only 28 per cent had a higher degree. Mean(s.d.) age was 53.1(15.2) years and 38 per cent were married. Sixty per cent had a cancer diagnosis. The mean(s.d.) total PSQ score before the event was 0.34(0.09) and that after the event was 0.38(0.11), significantly higher than the pre-event value (P < 0.001). Scores before and after the event did not differ between male or female patients, and did not correlate with age (Table 1). Perceived stress was higher than before cancellation. PSQ scores did not correlate with age or sex, in keeping with the work of others4. Perceived Stress Questionnaire scores in relation to sex and age Values are mean(s.d.). PSQ, Perceived Stress Questionnaire. *Paired t test. This work has revealed the hidden toll that cancellation of surgery had among patients during the more severe months of lockdown. The raised PSQ scores after cancellation may have implications for surgical outcomes not addressed in this work. Further studies should investigate these psychosocial repercussions. Disclosure. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,411
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBritish journal of surgeryMême sujetEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryTravaux en français237 207