Perspectives on Covid19 Safety Protocols among Non-Native English Speaking Teachers and Students
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study sought to elicit global perspectives on Covid19 safety protocols when communicated in English to teachers and students of other languages. Adherence through comprehension of safety protocols by non-native English speaking students and teachers of higher education institutions (HEIs) is central to this investigation. Covid19 pandemic resulted in an unprecedented impact on the education sector. Since the well-being of students and teachers against any form of risk is a priority, safety protocols should be communicated effectively using comprehensible language. However, there is a valid observation on the lack of inquiries on how HEIs communicate, facilitate and implement those safety protocols to ensure adherence. Hence, the quantitative research approach was employed to address the problem presented. Primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire from 450 global student and teacher respondents. The respondents were chosen through a referral sampling technique, also known as a snowball, they joined the online survey, which took place for a month. The descriptive correlational research design was used, and the data were treated using descriptive and inferential statistical tools. Results revealed that out of eighteen components of safety protocols for educational institutions, wearing face masks is clearly understood and was noted as the most prevalently observed. The high level of knowledge and awareness on safety protocols among respondents is linked to massive information dissemination. The step-wise regression model identified only two significant predictors for a conforming perspective: wearing a face mask and physical distancing. The rest of the pre-identified protocols do not significantly affect or influence the perspectives. These results suggest that the respondents adhere to all protocols and agree that wearing face masks is their foremost concern. A negative perspective is indicated toward those who resist following the Covid19 protocols, suggesting that the respondents are aware of the importance of safety protocols in reducing positive cases if religiously observed. This study concludes that protocols for any crisis should be maintained and institutionalised because they serve their purpose better with proper implementation. Furthermore, English as a medium for communicating those health and safety is not a barrier and did not interfere with the respondents’ understanding and adherence. Therefore, the language of the protocols is within the grasp of the respondents, which is attributed to the success of its implementation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».