Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Annual MeetingFull AccessWhat Do IMGs Need and How Can They Be Supported?Michael Myers, M.D., Edmond H. Pi, M.D.Michael MyersSearch for more papers by this author, M.D., Edmond H. PiSearch for more papers by this author, M.D.Published Online:25 Mar 2022https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2022.04.4.42AbstractInternational medical graduates are the backbone of psychiatry, and have experiences and needs that differ from their U.S. counterparts.International medical graduates (IMGs) comprise a quarter of the physicians and a third of the psychiatrists in the United States. More than a fourth of psychiatry trainees are IMGs. What’s more is that IMGs are the lifeblood of our mental health system, particularly in the public sector. Every year the Annual Meeting showcases excellent programming by and for IMGs (and for the many, interested others), and this year is no exception. We are excited to highlight here four standout sessions:The IMG Journey: Snapshots Across the Professional Lifespan (May 21, 8 a.m.-9:30 a.m.)In this highly interactive session, Vishal Madaan, M.D., Muhammad Zeshan, M.D., Naziya Hassan, M.D., and Consuelo C. Cagande, M.D.—who range in their careers from a resident to senior professor—will cover themes of acculturation, mentor-mentee relationships, supervision, unique issues in psychotherapy, career trajectories, and much more.International Medical Graduates and the Care of Older Adults With Mental Health Disorders in the United States (May 22, 1:30 a.m.-3 p.m.)Although IMGs make up almost half of the workforce of geriatric psychiatrists in this country, our population is aging, and more trained geriatric psychiatrists are sorely needed. In this session, Rajesh R. Tampi, M.S., M.D., will review the roles of IMGs as private practitioners, educators, academicians, and researchers and talk about ways APA can work to attract more IMGs into the geriatric field.Supporting IMGs Throughout Their Careers (May 24, 10:30 a.m.-noon)Since the pandemic began, IMGs are reporting disproportionate rates of burnout and dying by suicide at higher rates than ever before. They often do not receive the same resources as domestic psychiatrists. In a small group discussion with APA CEO and Medical Director Saul Levin, M.D., M.P.A., and early career psychiatrist and APA Scientific Program Committee member Elie Aoun, M.D. IMGs will have an opportunity to discuss the unique challenges they face and brainstorm ways in which APA might be able to assist.Double Minorities: Exploring Systemic Barriers Against Non-U.S. International Medical Graduates in Academic Psychiatry (May 25, 1:30 p.m.-3 p.m.)Chair Ramotse Saunders, M.D., and presenters Muniza A. Majoka, M.B.B.S., and Ali Maher Haidar, M.D., will review general stresses for IMGs but also specific issues for women and members of racial/ethnic minorities and the LGBTQ community. They invite attendees to engage with them in a far-ranging discussion to facilitate and foster academic careers for IMGs including peer and intergenerational mentoring, ally training, implicit bias training, and anti-racism/sexism initiatives.We hope to see you at APA’s Annual Meeting in May! Please join us as we celebrate IMGs’ successes through the years and identify ways that APA can better support them. ■Michael Myers, M.D., is a professor of clinical psychiatry at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y.Edmond H. Pi, M.D., is professor emeritus of clinical psychiatry at the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine. Both are members of APA’s Scientific Program Committee. ISSUES NewArchived
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,361 | 0,250 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».