Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Patients with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Incontinence Performing Regular Clean Intermittent Catheterization: Pooled Results from Two Phase 3 Randomized Studies (CONTENT1 and CONTENT2)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: For patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence (NDOI), treatment with oral medications is often unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) for NDOI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Two randomized, double-blind phase 3 studies (CONTENT1, NCT02660138; CONTENT2, NCT02660359) enrolled patients with NDOI who were regularly performing clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and were inadequately managed with oral therapy. Pooled results from the first placebo-controlled treatment cycle are reported. INTERVENTION: Patients received injections of aboBoNT-A 600 U (n = 162) or 800 U (n = 161) or placebo (n = 162) into the detrusor muscle. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in NDOI episodes per week at week 6. Secondary endpoints reported are the proportion of patients with no NDOI episodes, the volume per void, urodynamic parameters, and quality of life (QoL). Safety was also assessed. Statistical analyses were conducted for the pooled study populations (each aboBoNT-A dose vs placebo). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At week 6, NDOI episodes per week were significantly reduced in each aboBoNT-A group versus placebo (both p < 0.001) and the volume per void had significantly increased. Approximately one-third of patients in each aboBoNT-A dose group reported no NDOI episodes versus 3% of patients in the placebo group. Reductions in urinary incontinence (UI) were reflected in significantly greater improvements in UI-related QoL in the aboBoNT-A groups versus placebo. Urodynamic parameters (bladder capacity and detrusor pressure) were significantly improved with each aboBoNT-A dose versus placebo. Each aboBoNT-A dose was well tolerated. Symptomatic urinary tract infection was the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event, with incidence comparable across the aboBoNT-A and placebo groups. The studies were terminated prematurely owing to slow recruitment and were not designed for statistical comparison between the two aboBoNT-A doses. CONCLUSIONS: Intradetrusor aboBoNT-A is an effective treatment and alternative option for patients with NDOI who have an inadequate response to oral anticholinergics and are already performing CIC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In patients with bladder muscle overactivity caused by neurological conditions (multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury) and resulting in urinary incontinence, abobotulinumtoxinA injections improved their symptoms and bladder function, with no unexpected effects.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».