Assessment of Knowledge and Practices Regarding Elderly Care among Elderly Care Givers at Geriatric Homes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Elderly mainly need to caregivers who should have the chance to perform their practices toward their elderly by professional. Aim: to assess knowledge and practices regarding elderly care among elderly care givers at geriatric homes. Design: descriptive study design. Setting: In geriatric homes at Cairo governorate. Sample: A convenient sample included 60 of elderly caregivers working in the previous mentioned settings. Tool: two tools were used; interview questionnaire form (Appendix I): the questionnaire sheet was designed by the researcher and written in simple Arabic language based on scientific literature review and experts' opinion. It is comprised of two parts. Part I; It was used to assess demographic characteristics of elderly caregivers. Part II; It was used to assess knowledge about elderly care. Observational checklist to assess caregivers’ practices by researcher (Appendix II):it was adopted from Saskatchewan Ministry of Health Home Care Policy Manual (2021) and Rice (1999). The checklist was used to meet the needs of elderly caregivers. Results: show that 71.7% elderly caregivers regarded to gender were female. There were highly statistically significant difference and very highly statistically significant differences between total knowledge and total practices at P-value was (p < 0.01**) and (p < 0.001***) respectively. Conclusion: two fifths of studied sample age was ranged from 41 to less than 50 years old with the mean age was 38.53 ± 9.79. Majority of study sample were females than males, who were in common married. More than half of them were poor in total knowledge about elderly care at geriatric homes. For the total practices of the elderly caregivers toward elderly care at geriatric home, three quarters of the elderly caregivers were not competent. There was a positive correlation between knowledge score with practice score when r = 0.856. Recommendation: Encourage multidisciplinary researches in the same study in order to cover large group of elderly caregivers in different places and effectively address the issue of caregiver´s burden during caring for elderly with chronic illness and problematic behavior.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».