“Car body appearance and engine”: The morphology‐function correlation in chronic pancreatitis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a complex disease characterized by a continuous or recurrent inflammation of the pancreas1 that results in progressive and irreversible morphologic alterations causing pain and impairment of pancreatic function. Typical findings are focal necrosis, fibrosis, enlarged and irregular pancreatic duct, intraductal stones and calcifications.2, 3 As such alterations more often occur in late CP, different classifications divide the disease in early and advanced stages based on structural findings (Cambridge,4 Rosemont5) and also etiology, symptoms and functionality (Manchester,6 M-ANNHEIM7 and others). The advantage of the Cambridge classification is the comparability of stage classification independent of the used imaging modality as Cambridge 0–4 was defined for endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging as well. However, none of the classifications published so far was prospectively evaluated to predict prognosis, course and complications of patients with CP.8 In addition, several cohort studies failed to correlate in particular early morphological alterations and pancreatic insufficiency but found positive correlation in advanced stages of CP.9 In the current issue of UEG-Journal, Nordaas and colleagues10 analyzed the association between structural alterations of patients with CP and complications, mainly endocrine and exocrine insufficiency. This was a cross-sectional analysis including more than 700 patients from the multicentric Scandinavian-Baltic-Pancreatic-Club database with CP classified by the M-ANNHEIM-criteria. In- and exclusion criteria as well as outcomes were clearly defined. In general, the authors found that a continuous organ involvement meaning structural abnormalities in the entire pancreas was associated with both pancreatic exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. Moreover, severe calcifications, main pancreatic duct obstruction and pancreatic atrophy were linked to exocrine insufficiency. These findings are clearly comprehensible as exocrine insufficiency usually occurs if less than 10% of the pancreas remain functionally active and the entire pancreas reveals structural abnormalities.11 Notably, the authors also found a negative association between pancreatic pseudocysts and diabetes. Diabetes was not associated with pancreatic atrophy although the authors described such a link in their own prior publications.12 In another previous report from the same consortium, the “inflammatory cluster”, that include pseudocysts, was associated with alcoholic etiology.13 In the latest study, analysis was corrected for current alcohol consumption, but association with etiology is not evaluated in depth. These discrepancies may also depend on the limitations of a cross-sectional design in a database-related study where not all necessarily information are available for each patient. Moreover, there is a risk of a selection bias as distinct subgroups may be over- or underreported. Indeed, patients with more symptoms and an “inflammatory” pattern are more likely to undergo imaging studies. What could we learn from this large study of the Scandinavian-Baltic-Pancreatic-Club? Out of more than 700 patients with strictly classified CP, abnormalities involving the whole pancreas are associated with both exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. However, association is not causation and a long-term observational study of such a large CP-cohort will ever hard to become reality. This study also demonstrated that CP is still a complex disease with variable complaints and complications. Structural alterations are important to diagnose the disease but remain less helpful to identify patients who will develop complications or a severe course in a timely manner and are therefore candidates for intensive surveillance. Several questions are unanswered and need future investigation: What is the importance of the so-called painless chronic pancreatitis that usually occurs in elderly people14, 15 and often is underreported in such database studies? Moreover, different classifications of CP have to be evaluated in prospective studies to determine accuracy and predictive value for the development of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. Finally, a “simple” association with a structural finding in cross-sectional imaging or endoscopic ultrasound may not be sufficient to help identifying patients at risk for complications. It is likely that in the near future, the use of artificial intelligence applications able to include serial monitoring of multiple radiomics, clinical, biochemical and environmental factors in an automated, unbiased tool, will fill the gaps between imaging and clinical course in CP. The authors have nothing to disclose.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».