2021 International Cancer Education Conference Program and Abstracts
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Develop strategies that explore and address health inequities to alleviate cancer disparities.2. Identify and support training, interdisciplinary collaboration, and mentorship opportunities for junior investigators and practitioners to support their development as cancer researchers and educators. 3.Plan and advocate for interdisciplinary programs that promote patientcentered care and equity in diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and survivorship of cancer for patients, their families, communities, and society.Patient, Family, and Public Education 4. Identify and implement innovative and evidence-based cancer education strategies, including culturally, linguistically, and literacy relevant approaches. 5.Discuss creative and effective approaches to incorporating multimedia and technology in cancer education, including in the design, implementation, and evaluation of programs.6. Promote best practices of patient-centered care to improve social, economic and environmental conditions, promote health equity and engage and educate patients, families, and survivors.7. Discuss strategies for integrating culture, spirituality, and social support into cancer education.Global Cancer Education 8. Enhance collaborations to enable participants across the care continuum to foster new discoveries and lead to lowering the global burden of cancer. 9.Identify opportunities to support and promote biomedical, clinical, behavioral, and health services research that is culturally relevant and responsive to the needs of underserved populations.10. Support activities that establish and promote global cancer education initiatives among national and international cancer education organizations.TARGET AUDIENCE Attendees will include oncologists, primary care physicians, surgeons, radiologists, ministries of health, cancer experts (government and association), researchers, nurses, dentists, geneticists, epidemiologists, behavioral scientists, pharmacists, pharmacologists, health/patient educators, patient navigators and community health educators, librarians, social workers, allied and public health professionals, students, and members of patient advocacy groups.Past participants have included attendees from the world's medical centers, cancer care organizations, comprehensive cancer centers, and academic institutions responsible for developing, implementing, and evaluating cancer education curricula, research, and programs.CONFERENCE GOALS ICEC attendees will engage in professional development through educational opportunities, including: & Expert plenary sessions and abstract presentations addressing topics of disparities in cancer care and research, precision medicine, genomics, survivorship, professional education (medical, nursing, and allied health) and global innovations in cancer education.& Skill-based workshops addressing cancer education including grant writing; publishing; utilizing a translator or interpreter; survivorship; health literacy; working with underserved populations; genetics and cancer; palliative care; and more.& Poster presentations featuring over 100 research studies, evidencebased practices in oncology, innovative education programs and quality improvement projects.& Forums focused on ongoing multi-institutional programs on current topics in cancer education including targeted therapies, survivorship, health literacy, social media, professional training and international outreach with disparate populations.& Networking opportunities and scheduled mentorship with international leaders and researchers in cancer education to enable collaborations that address common cancer education challenges and share new and existing resources. ACCREDITATIONSIn support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Amedco LLC and the American Association for Cancer Education.Amedco LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.Physicians: Amedco LLC designates this live and enduring material for a maximum of 22.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits TM .Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.Nurses: Amedco LLC designates this activity for a maximum of 22.00 ANCC contact hours. Certified Health Education Specialists (CHES):
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,252 | 0,067 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».