Effect of Maximal and Submaximal Muscle Activation on Corticospinal Excitability in Humans
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Following short duration (5‐10s), high intensity (≥70%MVC) muscle activation, there is an enhancement of muscle contractile properties, termed post action potentiation (PAP). During PAP induced by voluntary or electrically stimulated conditioning contractions (CC) it has been reported that the corticospinal silent period (SP), assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is elongated. Although a coexistence between the two occurs, the direct effect of PAP on corticospinal excitability has not been systematically evaluated to help determine whether a direct link exists. The purpose was to assess SP duration following potentiating and non‐potentiating voluntary and electrically stimulated contractions. We hypothesized that maximal and submaximal CCs inducing PAP and those not inducing PAP enhancement, respectively, will prolong SP durations albeit to a lesser degree at submaximal intensities. Methods Ten healthy young (three females; 18‐35y) individuals free of neurological issues to date have participated in the study. Subjects were seated with their right forearm pronated and their hand was fixed to a custom finger abduction force dynamometer. Monopolar surface electromyography signals were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) with self‐adhering Ag/AgCl electrodes. Peripheral stimulated twitches and tetani (50Hz) were evoked over the ulnar nerve at the wrist via a pair of small readjustable electrodes. Maximal M‐waves (M‐max) and baseline levels of (voluntary and stimulated) PAP and force were obtained for each subject. Electrically stimulated and voluntarily induced CCs of 10s were performed at ~95% MVC and ~35% MVC for a total of four contraction conditions. Before and after these contractions SP times were obtained during the plateau of ~25% MVC held for three seconds. To obtain SP times the TMS output was set to elicit a response ~75% of M‐max. The four conditions of voluntary or stimulated, maximal and submaximal CCs were pseudo‐randomized and repeated four times per subject. The nearest three values from each subject were averaged and compared as a normalized percent change from baseline. Results Following both maximal voluntary and stimulated CCs, mean twitch torque was enhanced similarly (PAP ~180%) with no PAP at the submaximal levels. Mean change in SP duration following maximal voluntary CCs was ~14% longer than control values, while maximal tetanic CCs similarly prolonged the SP by ~13%. Both voluntary and stimulated submaximal contractions prolonged SP duration similarly by ~5% and ~6%, respectively. Conclusion These findings indicate that corticospinal inhibition assessed as SP elongation is present not only when the muscle is enhanced under PAP but also occurs following contractions inducing no PAP. This suggests that the muscle activation required to induce PAP likely causes the observed corticospinal inhibition, not the enhanced muscle properties of PAP per se.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».