Towards restorative spaces for postnatal recovery in urban tertiary hospitals
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Modern living and globalisation are increasingly contributing to access to and utilisation of modern healthcare services in both developed and developing countries; from diagnosis, treatments, and even to birth in a specialised healthcare environment. In many resource-rich countries, birth is one of the main reasons for women’s hospitalisation. Research suggests that physical environments of healthcare impact on patient/users’ health outcomes. Yet decisions about healthcare facilities’ design and programming are often made without input from users. A key challenge for patient-centred care in the maternity field is the assumption that healthcare spaces and facilities created for the general “unwell” hospital population can support the emotional, physiological and psychological needs of healthy women who give birth in hospitals. Previous research into the childbirth environment has focused on physical environments and satisfaction with the labour and birth process. But studies examining the impacts of physical environments on women’s postnatal recovery experience and wellbeing have been limited. The aim of this thesis is to determine the design factors that influence women’s recovery experiences and wellbeing with a view to proposing design guidelines for optimal postnatal environment in large, tertiary hospitals. A two phase sequential explanatory mixed methods approach was taken to the research which combined a quantitative method (online survey questionnaires) with a qualitative approach (focus group discussions – FGDs). Research was conducted with two user groups, comprising postnatal women and midwives, to examine perceptions of physical environment factors that influence women’s recovery experiences and wellbeing in New Zealand hospitals. The results of the questionnaire surveys were followed up in phase two FGDs to provide explanations and descriptions of architectural factors and design features that impacted on women’s recovery experiences and psychological wellbeing. The results were compared, synthesised and interpreted to inform the outcomes of this thesis. The research found several physical environment factors and design features which were significant and a number which were non-significant among the two user groups in all four categories investigated: perception of postnatal room features; interior environment; sensory comfort environment and social comfort environment. The research found factors related to maintenance (e.g. cleanliness), environmental design (e.g. noise/quiet in rooms, and daylighting), and interior spatial characteristics (e.g. view to nature, combined home-like and clinical features and privacy) are more important in fostering wellbeing. Strong evidence was found on how building spaces impact on postnatal recovery experience, especially regarding single-bed rooms for emotional support and psychosocial support environments such as communal spaces and outdoor environments. The original contribution of this thesis is an identification of the environments which have the potential for enhanced recovery experience of women during the postnatal period. This understanding of the architectural design factors and building spaces could help architects, healthcare designers and hospital care providers in applying and promoting restorativeness in large, tertiary hospitals to better help in providing quality postnatal care for women whose hospital stays are crucial to their wellbeing and health prior to going home with their new baby.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».