MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4226044143 · doi:10.1093/hropen/hoac014

Protocol for developing a core outcome set for male infertility research: an international consensus development study

2022· review· en· W4226044143 sur OpenAlexaff
Michael P. Rimmer, Ruth Howie, Richard A. Anderson, Christopher L. R. Barratt, Kurt T. Barnhart, Yusuf Beebeejaun, Ricardo Pimenta Bertolla, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Lars Björndahl, Pietro Bortoletto, Robert E. Brannigan, Astrid EP Cantineau, Ettore Caroppo, Barbara Collura, Kevin Coward, Michael L. Eisenberg, Christian De Geyter, Dimitrios G. Goulis, Ralf Henkel, Vu N A Ho, Alayman Hussein, Carin Huyser, Jozef H Kadijk, Mohan S Kamath, Shadi Khashaba, Yoshitomo Kobori, Julia Kopeika, Tansu Küçük, Saturnino Luján, Thabo Matsaseng, Raj Mathur, Kevin McEleny, Rod T. Mitchell, Ben W. Mol, Alfred Murage, Ernest Hung Yu Ng, Allan Pacey, Antti Perheentupa, Stefan S. du Plessis, Nathalie Rives, Ippokratis Sarris, Peter N. Schlegel, Majid Shabbir, Maciej Śmiechowski, Venkatesh Subramanian, Sesh Kamal Sunkara, Basil C Tarlarzis, Frank Tüttelmann, Andy Vail, Madelon van Wely, Mónica H. Vazquez‐Levin, Lan N. Vuong, Alex Wang, Rui Wang, Armand Zini, Cindy Farquhar, Craig Niederberger, James MN Duffy

Notice bibliographique

RevueHuman Reproduction Open · 2022
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDelphi Technique in Research
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesMedical Research CouncilUrology Foundation
Mots-clésDelphi methodInfertilityFertilityRandomized controlled trialMedicineOutcome (game theory)Health careProtocol (science)Set (abstract data type)Family medicineMedical educationPsychologyAlternative medicinePolitical sciencePopulationComputer scienceSurgeryPregnancy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract STUDY QUESTION We aim to develop, disseminate and implement a minimum data set, known as a core outcome set, for future male infertility research. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Research into male infertility can be challenging to design, conduct and report. Evidence from randomized trials can be difficult to interpret and of limited ability to inform clinical practice for numerous reasons. These may include complex issues, such as variation in outcome measures and outcome reporting bias, as well as failure to consider the perspectives of men and their partners with lived experience of fertility problems. Previously, the Core Outcome Measure for Infertility Trials (COMMIT) initiative, an international consortium of researchers, healthcare professionals and people with fertility problems, has developed a core outcome set for general infertility research. Now, a bespoke core outcome set for male infertility is required to address the unique challenges pertinent to male infertility research. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, allied healthcare professionals, scientists, researchers and people with fertility problems, will be invited to participate. Formal consensus science methods will be used, including the modified Delphi method, modified Nominal Group Technique and the National Institutes of Health’s consensus development conference. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS An international steering group, including the relevant stakeholders outlined above, has been established to guide the development of this core outcome set. Possible core outcomes will be identified by undertaking a systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating potential treatments for male factor infertility. These outcomes will be entered into a modified Delphi method. Repeated reflection and re-scoring should promote convergence towards consensus outcomes, which will be prioritized during a consensus development meeting to identify a final core outcome set. We will establish standardized definitions and recommend high-quality measurement instruments for individual core outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work has been supported by the Urology Foundation small project award, 2021. C.L.R.B. is the recipient of a BMGF grant and received consultancy fees from Exscentia and Exceed sperm testing, paid to the University of Dundee and speaking fees or honoraria paid personally by Ferring, Copper Surgical and RBMO. S.B. received royalties from Cambridge University Press, Speaker honoraria for Obstetrical and Gynaecological Society of Singapore, Merk SMART Masterclass and Merk FERRING Forum, paid to the University of Aberdeen. Payment for leadership roles within NHS Grampian, previously paid to self, now paid to University of Aberdeen. An Honorarium is received as Editor in Chief of Human Reproduction Open. M.L.E. is an advisor to the companies Hannah and Ro. B.W.M. received an investigator grant from the NHMRC, No: GNT1176437 is a paid consultant for ObsEva and has received research funding from Ferring and Merck. R.R.H. received royalties from Elsevier for a book, consultancy fees from Glyciome, and presentation fees from GryNumber Health and Aytu Bioscience. Aytu Bioscience also funded MiOXYS systems and sensors. Attendance at Fertility 2020 and Roadshow South Africa by Ralf Henkel was funded by LogixX Pharma Ltd. R.R.H. is also Editor in Chief of Andrologia and has been an employee of LogixX Pharma Ltd. since 2020. M.S.K. is an associate editor with Human Reproduction Open. K.Mc.E. received an honoraria for lectures from Bayer and Pharmasure in 2019 and payment for an ESHRE grant review in 2019. His attendance at ESHRE 2019 and AUA 2019 was sponsored by Pharmasure and Bayer, respectively. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative registration No: 1586. Available at www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1586. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE N/A. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT N/A.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,340
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,365
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesMétarecherche
DomaineSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Protocole · Signal consensuel: Protocole
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,660
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,814

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,3400,365
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0060,009
Bibliométrie0,0110,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,006
Communication savante0,0080,008
Science ouverte0,0070,010
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,016
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0490,017

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,961
Tête enseignante GPT0,749
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
DomaineMéthodes
GenreProtocole

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations13
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHuman Reproduction OpenMême sujetDelphi Technique in ResearchTravaux en français237 207