Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Kiss & Tell Adib Khorram and Alaine Martaus Khorram, Adib Kiss & Tell. Dial, 2022 [ 384p] Trade ed. ISBN 9780593325261 $18.99 E-book ed. ISBN 9780593325285 $10.99 Reviewed from digital galleys R* Gr. 9-12 Seventeen-year-old Vancouver native Hunter Drake has a dream life. As the openly gay member of a chart-topping boy band, he's a role model and advocate for queer kids everywhere, and he's about to embark with his best friends on their first crosscontinent stadium tour. Inside, however, Hunter is a downward-spiraling wreck, and his growing resentment at playing a role both on-stage and off it might just lay waste to his friendships, romance, band, fanbase, and musical future alike—or it may create a space for Hunter to perform as his best, truest self. Hunter's recent break-up with longtime boyfriend Aidan unfolded badly, and his most private sexts are now public, damaging his clean-cut gay-boy image and the band's album sales. So, when the Label steps in, suggesting a reputationsaving romance with Kaivan Parvani, the adorable drummer of their opening act and someone Hunter's crushing on anyway, it seems like the perfect solution, even if it takes time away from bandmates and song writing for their all-important third album. As his relationship with Kaivan blossoms, though, Hunter quickly tires of using his real feelings to feed a PR-stunt. Khorram sets Hunter's struggle to find his authentic self against the trappings of contemporary fame and online fandom here, providing an in-depth, multifaceted look at the best and worst of the media whirl Hunter occupies. His first-person narration exists alongside squee-ing fan posts and slash fan fiction, intrusive articles with juicy click-bait headlines, concerned columns explaining his behavior to young fans, and sample emails from Label executives looking to market an overtly feminized image once it's revealed Hunter is a bottom. All combine to craft a picture both realistic and unsettling, an indictment of celebrity culture but also a compassionate look at Hunter, who is understandably, even relatably, reluctant to set boundaries, especially when his public accessibility allows him to maintain the pop star life he loves, continue the good work he does with his national platform, and, more essentially, protect the band's future for his friends. The interwoven elements, buttressed by an editorial about "the performance of hetero-respectability" and a photoshoot with other out celebrities, invite readers to question what audiences demand of queer celebrities to make them acceptable and palatable. It's a compelling, impressively crafted theme that is made only more inclusive as Hunter learns he's not the only one conforming to a publicfriendly image. His bandmates' "mosaic of ethnicities" (there are Vietnamese-, Brazilian-, and Indian-Canadian members) alongside Iranian-American Kaivan, gives readers more windows into the pressures faced by diversity representatives and ultimately opens Hunter's eyes to struggles beyond his own. [End Page 241] Indeed, it's the open, honest friendships he shares with his bandmates—one of the novel's strongest emotional resonances—and his new love for Kaivan that draw his gaze away from his navel to focus on racial and intersectional struggles. The novel also wisely avoids the idea that one person's suffering negates the importance of another's, instead letting Hunter's self-reflection feed into empathy and end with a mutually supportive respect for everyone's limits, even Hunter's ex's. Readers looking to celebrate their boy-band fandom or add to their boymeets-boy reading list will revel in everything this novel has to offer: the joy Hunter feels on stage, the depth of his male friendships, and the supportive but not blind love he shares with Kaivan. Ultimately so much more than the simple romcom, this is a thought-provoking pleasure read that hits all the right notes. Copyright © 2022 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,892 | 0,855 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».