MP37-14 A DOSE-ESCALATING PHASE I STUDY OF AN INJECTION OF LIDOCAINE PASTE FOR PROLONGED SPERMATIC CORD BLOCK IN MEN WITH CHRONIC SCROTAL CONTENT PAIN
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP37-14 A DOSE-ESCALATING PHASE I STUDY OF AN INJECTION OF LIDOCAINE PASTE FOR PROLONGED SPERMATIC CORD BLOCK IN MEN WITH CHRONIC SCROTAL CONTENT PAIN Luke Witherspoon, Claudia Kesch, Veronika Schmitt, Graeme Boniface, Colin Lundeen, J. Curtis Nickel, Ryan Paterson, Martin Gleave, and Ryan Flannigan Luke WitherspoonLuke Witherspoon More articles by this author , Claudia KeschClaudia Kesch More articles by this author , Veronika SchmittVeronika Schmitt More articles by this author , Graeme BonifaceGraeme Boniface More articles by this author , Colin LundeenColin Lundeen More articles by this author , J. Curtis NickelJ. Curtis Nickel More articles by this author , Ryan PatersonRyan Paterson More articles by this author , Martin GleaveMartin Gleave More articles by this author , and Ryan FlanniganRyan Flannigan More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002591.14AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Spermatic cord block with local anesthetics provides pain relief in a subset of subjects with chronic scrotal content pain (CSCP), but relief is short-lived due to the rapid elimination of local anesthetics. This Phase I trial assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a long-acting formulation of lidocaine in patients with CSCP. METHODS: This was a prospective, single center, open label, single arm, Phase I dose-escalating trial. Male patients ≥19 years with unilateral scrotal pain lasting ≥3 months who reported an average daily maximum pain score over 7 days of ≥4 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) were recruited. The investigational drug ST-01 (sustained-release lidocaine polymer solution for injection) is a long-acting lidocaine injected into the spermatic cord. ST-01 has two inactive ingredients, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) which slow the release of lidocaine. The study had 3 planned dose-escalating cohorts: cohort I: 2 mL of 140 mg/mL ST-01 (280 mg lidocaine); cohort II: 3 mL of 140 mg/mL ST-01 (420 mg lidocaine); cohort III: 4 mL of 140 mg/mL ST-01 (560 mg lidocaine). Subjects recorded their pain (NRS) three times a day on days 0–14, and once on days 15-27 of the study. The Chronic Epididymitis Symptom Index (CESI) was completed by patients on days 0, 7, 14, and 28 (end of study). RESULTS: Twenty subjects were screened, with 12 subjects being enrolled. NRS (mean, median) was reduced across all cohorts studied. Patients in cohort II (420 mg lidocaine) were identified via the dose escalation protocol. This group reported a baseline mean (median) NRS score of 5.3 (5), compared to an end of study score of 3.3 (3.5). Assessment of CESI score showed reduced scores over the study period with cohort II reporting a baseline mean (median) score of 19.8 (19) and an end of study value of 16.8 (17.5). Serum lidocaine concentrations were measured at 1 hour, 1 day and 7 days. Serum concentrations were similar across all cohorts at day 1 indicating only local release of the medication. There were no serious adverse events (SAE’s) reported in the study. All subjects reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Most TEAE’s were mild or moderate and related to bruising or swelling at the injection site. CONCLUSIONS: ST-01 was safely injected in 12 subjects suffering from CSCP with a promising efficacy signal. Source of Funding: This study was conducted with aid from the Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute Translation and Innovation Award © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e614 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Luke Witherspoon More articles by this author Claudia Kesch More articles by this author Veronika Schmitt More articles by this author Graeme Boniface More articles by this author Colin Lundeen More articles by this author J. Curtis Nickel More articles by this author Ryan Paterson More articles by this author Martin Gleave More articles by this author Ryan Flannigan More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».