MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4226186742 · doi:10.4103/aian.aian_604_21

Single Ring-Enhancing Lesion with the Lipid Peak on MR Spectroscopy

2022· article· en· W4226186742 sur OpenAlexaff
Vinay Goel, Leve Joseph, Deepa Dash, Sushant Agarwal, Ajay Garg

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueParasitic infections in humans and animals
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineLesionFluid-attenuated inversion recoveryTegmentumMidbrainPtosisEdemaRadiologyNuclear medicineMagnetic resonance imagingPathologySurgeryInternal medicineCentral nervous system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

CLINICAL DESCRIPTION A 12-year-old boy presented in our emergency department with chief complaints of two episodes of seizures, headache, vomiting, and bilateral ptosis for the past 7 days. On neurological examination, bilateral third cranial nerve palsies were seen. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain revealed a conglomerate peripherally enhancing cystic lesion of size 9 mm in the tegmentum of the midbrain with perilesional edema [Figure 1]. The core of the cystic lesion was hyperintense on T2-WI and hypointense on FLAIR images suggesting signal suppression and CSF-like fluid contents. Eccentric scolex was seen on T2 W and FLAIR images. MR spectroscopy [Figure 1d] performed at short TE of 35 ms shows a lipid peak within the core of the lesion. A contrast-enhanced CT scan [Figure 2a] showed a peripherally enhancing lesion with eccentric scolex in the right tegmentum of the midbrain, suggesting the possibility of neurocysticercosis (NCC). A provisional diagnosis of NCC was made, and the patient was put on a tapering dose of steroids. Follow-up NCCT done after one month showed a decrease in the size of the lesion and perilesional edema [Figure 2b]. His ptosis improved after three months of clinical follow-up.Figure 1: MRI brain. Axial T2 WI (a) shows a single conglomerate lesion of 2 cysts (thick arrow and hairpin-arrow) with extensive perilesional edema on the right side of the tegmentum of the midbrain. The core of the larger cyst is hyperintense on T2 WI (a) and hypointense on FLAIR (b) images suggesting signal suppression. Scolex is seen as eccentric dot-like hypointensity (thin arrow in a) on T2 WI (a) and as hyperintensity (thin arrow in b) on FLAIR (b) images. Axial post gadolinium T1 WI (c) shows peripheral enhancement of the lesion, MR spectroscopy (d) shows lipid peak at short TE (arrowhead)Figure 2: Contrast-enhanced CT scan of the brain at the level of the third ventricle shows a well-defined peripherally enhancing lesion with eccentric scolex (a) in the right side of the tegmentum of the midbrain. A follow-up non-contrast CT scan done after one month (b) shows a significant reduction in the lesion size (arrow)DISCUSSION The presence of scolex within a cystic lesion on CT/MRI is one of the definitive criteria of the diagnosis of NCC[1]; however, sometimes neurotuberculoma has been reported to have central calcification, which may be mistaken for scolex. MR spectroscopy (MRS) has been used to characterize various neurological lesions like brain abscess, tumors, cystic lesions, and granulomatous lesions like tuberculoma in the last few years. A classification of the various pathologic metabolic spectra has been developed by Chernov et al.[2] classifying MRS spectra into types I, II, and III according to the predominant metabolite peak (NAA, choline, lipid) with further subtypes A, B, and C depending upon the presence of lactate and lipid peaks. The lipid peak is seen as a singlet at 1.33 ppm, is broad, and has a shoulder on the left. The lipid peak does not invert at intermediate echo time; this feature helps differentiate lipid from lactate. The lipid peak is usually best seen at short TE due to short T2 of lipids and is not detectable in normal brain tissue.[3] Sometimes adjacent subcutaneous fat or fatty calvarial bone marrow may contaminate the voxel and erroneously show an abnormal lipid peak; thus, one should be careful in voxel placement. Tuberculoma shows a prominent lipid peak due to the presence of lipid in the cell wall of mycobacteria.[4] Solid tumors like lymphoma[5] and papillary craniopharyngioma[2] may show lipid peak on MRS. Cystic lesions like adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma can also show lipid peak.[2] Proton spectroscopy of cysticercal fluid may show increased choline, lipid, succinate, alanine, and acetate and reduced levels of NAA and creatine; best seen at intermediate TE.[6] As the scolex degenerates, there is a proliferation of membranes resulting in increased lipids.[7] The presence of lipid peak in a ring-enhancing lesion is not pathognomonic of neurotuberculoma, and lipid peak alone on MRS should not be used to differentiate between tuberculoma and neurocysticercosis. Other morphological characteristics of NCC like size, presence of scolex, suppression of core signal on FLAIR images, and different stages of evolution should be used in diagnosing NCC. Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,017

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,074
Tête enseignante GPT0,349
Écart entre enseignants0,275 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of Indian Academy of NeurologyMême sujetParasitic infections in humans and animalsTravaux en français237 207