An empirical study of e-learning post-acceptance after the spread of COVID-19
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
There are various reasons why vaccine fear has resulted in public rejection. Students have raised concerns about vaccine effectiveness, leading to hesitation when it comes to vaccination. Vaccination apprehension impacts students' perceptions, which has an impact on the acceptability of an e-learning platform. As a result, the goal of this study is to look at the post-acceptance of an e-learning platform using a conceptual model with several factors. Every variable makes a unique contribution to the e-learning platform's post-acceptance. In the current study, TAM variables were combined with additional external factors such as fear of vaccination, perceived routine use, perceived enjoyment, perceived critical mass, and self- efficacy, all of which are directly associated with post-acceptance of an e-learning platform. Here, a hybrid conceptual model was used to evaluate the newly widespread use of e-learning platforms in this area in this study in the UAE. In the past, empirical investigations primarily used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis; however, this study used a developing hybrid analysis approach that combines SEM with deep learning–based Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). This study also employed the Importance–Performance Map Analysis (IPMA) to determine the significance and performance of each element. Through the findings, it was found that fear of vaccination, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived routine use, perceived enjoyment, perceived critical mass, and self-efficiency all had a significant impact on students' behavioral intention to use the e-learning platform for educational purposes. It was also shown in the analysis of ANN as well as IPMA that the perceived ease of use of the e-learning platform is the most important indicator of post-acceptance. The proposed model, in theory, provides appropriate explanations for the elements that influence post-acceptance of the e-learning platform in terms of internet service factors at the individual level. In the practical sense, these findings will help decision-makers and practitioners in higher education institutions identify the factors that should be given extra care and plan their policies accordingly. The ability of the deep ANN architecture to identify the non-linear relationships between the factors involved in the theoretical model has been determined in this research. The implication offers extensive information about taking effective steps to decrease the fear of vaccination among people and increase vaccination confidence among teachers and educators and students, consequently impacting society.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».