Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The following letter originally appeared in the March 2000 issue of The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. It contained substantial errors in dosages and was printed without the authors' approval. We apologize to the authors and readers. The corrected text appears here in its entirety. Paroxetine and Tardive Akathisia Dear Editor: There have been several reports of akathisia associated with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), usually rapid in onset and occurring within days of drug initiation (1). This report describes the case of a patient who developed delayed-onset or tardive akathisia with paroxetine treatment. Case Report Mr A was a 38-year-old male with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), with compulsions to view morgues and operating rooms. In addition, he suffered from multiple paraphilias, including pedophilia, exhibitionism, and voyeurism. He was born prematurely to a mother who had abused drugs and alcohol throughout the pregnancy, and he had a cleft lip and palate repaired after birth. He also had significant facial dysmorphism. Despite this background, he had a normal to above-average intellect and good insight into his psychiatric problems. He was compliant with his treatment, with few emergency visits and no history of drug-seeking behaviour. He had been treated with paroxetine 70 mg once daily for 2 years for his OCD. In addition, he received leuprolide (Lupron) 7.5 mg intramuscularly (IM) every 4 weeks for 7 years for his paraphilias, and alendronate (Fosamax)5 mg once daily for 3 years for osteoporosis. Previously, a trial of clomipramine had also been used for his OCD. In addition, a diagnosis of Tourette syndrome had been considered in his past because of the presence of motor tics, which resulted in the trial of pimozide 3 years ago. However, this medication was stopped shortly thereafter because the patient developed an acute akathisia. At this time, Mr A presented with a subjective inner restlessness, which he described as being identical to his reaction to pimozide 3 years previously. Objectively, he was noted to have restless leg movements. There had been no change to his medication regimen for 2 years. He was started on lorazepam 1 mg 3 times daily as needed, and all complaints of restlessness disappeared after 4 days. No further treatment or medication change was required. Discussion Tardive akathisia is defined as an akathisia of delayed onset, in the absence of a change of drug dose or type within 3 months (2). The incidence of acute akathisia with neuroleptics is in the range of 20% to 30% (3), compared with 9.8% to 25% for SSRIs (1). The incidence of tardive akathisia with neuroleptics has been reported to be between 18% and 41% (2). Tardive akathisia has not been reported previously in relation to drugs other than antipsychotics (2). While the differential diagnosis for this case could include anxiety related to the patient's OCD, or the combination of medications, the subjective similarityto the previous akathisia and its quick resolution with lorazepam led to a diagnosis of tardive akathisia. Of his 3 medications, paroxetine was the only psychoactive substance and, thus, was the most likely cause of this reaction. Given this patient's complex medical history, there may have been a genetic predisposition to the development of akathisia in this particular case. It has been suggested that SSRIs may inhibit dopaminergic neuronal activity in the ventral tegmental area to produce akathisia (4). While previous reports have indicated that the clinician must be aware of the possibility of akathisia when initiating an SSRI, this case illustrates that this side effect may occur without a recent change in the medication.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,022 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».