MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4229536699 · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2007.00686.x

Obituary

2007· paratext· en· W4229536699 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Kathy Martin

Notice bibliographique

RevueIbis · 2007
Typeparatext
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAvian ecology and behavior
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésObituaryGeographyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As an ‘Easter diversion’ while enrolled in Chemistry at the University of Edinburgh, Jamie Smith accompanied his friend John Shanks to Ailsa Craig in the Firth of Clyde to count North Atlantic Gannets Sula bassana. This trip precipitated his switch to the study of Zoology and a lifelong interest in the ecology of bird populations, especially on islands. James Neil Munro Smith, known to most as ‘Jamie’, was born on 1 May 1944 in Rothesay on the Isle of Bute, Scotland. Jamie graduated from Edinburgh in 1967 as a Zoologist, and completed a D. Phil. under Mike Cullen at Oxford (1967–71). As a Smithsonian Research Fellow, he studied population variation among Darwin's finches in the Galapagos with Peter and Rosemary Grant. In 1973, he assumed a faculty position in the Zoology Department at the University of British Columbia. For the next three decades, Jamie combined his love of birds, science and nature to make major contributions to ornithology, conservation and education. He lost an 11-year battle to cancer on 18 July 2005 at his home in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Jamie's arrival at Oxford in 1967 coincided with the rapid growth of behavioural and evolutionary ecology. He got involved in the debates about how adaptation and natural selection shaped the behaviour of individuals, population dynamics and avian life histories. Jamie's research on area-restricted searching by foraging songbirds had an immediate effect on the field by drawing attention to the constraints faced by ‘would be’ optimal foragers deciding where to feed and how much habitat to sample. His first paper, published in Animal Behaviour with Richard Dawkins in 1971, used laboratory-reared Great Tits Parus major and controlled the food density of ‘habitat patches’ to test key assumptions about the perception of foraging profitability in birds. His D. Phil. research on food searching and habitat sampling of Song Thrushes Turdus philomelos and Blackbirds T. merula, using field observations and arrays of artificial baits, was published in two papers in Behaviour (1974). With an extension of his D. Phil. research, Jamie and H.P. Sweatman supported predictions that predators maximize efficiency by sampling habitats, spend more time where success is high and depress prey numbers as a consequence, but they also highlighted the constraints to optimal foraging by an individual due to handling time, prey depletion and social factors limiting access to food (Ecology 1974). Jamie's first four papers generated important insights on individual variation and the constraints to the expression of optimal behaviours in nature. Jamie applied his creative blend of tests of scientific theory with empirical field research and simple elegant field and laboratory experiments to questions in life history evolution and population and community ecology throughout his career. Always, his work was grounded in ecological realism. At UBC, Jamie and his colleagues began to elucidate the complexities of avian demography in North America by conducting songbird studies on small islands and the mainland, and successfully applied these data to evolutionary problems of broad theoretical interest. In 1974, Jamie assumed the lead of a 16-year field study, started by F. Tompa in 1959, of an individually marked population of Song Sparrows Melospiza melodia on Mandarte Island, a small islet off the coast of British Columbia. The work focused on critical demographic parameters including the functions of territoriality, food limitation, nestling condition, winter survival, predation, impacts of cowbirds, population regulation, life history evolution and response to natural selection. Jamie's early work on Song Sparrows demonstrated experimentally heritable variation in morphological traits. He also revealed a phenotypic correlation between fecundity and survival that was positive, but in later work with Dolph Schluter a genetic correlation that was negative, perhaps reflecting the positive effect of a common environment on both traits resulting in opposing natural selection. Peter Arcese of UBC inherited the Mandarte Island project in 1991, and continues the field study. With 32 years of data on Song Sparrows from Mandarte Island, several nearby islets and studies on the mainland, the work of Jamie, his colleagues and successors stands out as one of the most extensive analyses of meta-population dynamics in birds. Since Brown-headed Cowbirds Molothrus ater arrived on Mandarte Island about the same time as Jamie, he became interested in the demographic consequences of bird parasites on both common and endangered species of songbirds. Despite the prevailing wisdom that Cowbirds were ecological villains, he set out to determine their ecological role in songbird communities. He first examined how hosts responded, and then focused on the impacts of Cowbirds on host populations. In his multi-authored book on the Ecology and Management of Cowbirds and their Hosts (2000, University of Texas Press), he determined that Cowbirds were not increasing, that there was little evidence that Cowbirds limit the population size of many host species and, most importantly, that Cowbird control often does not result in increased populations of their endangered hosts. On Mandarte Island, however, Cowbirds significantly reduced the reproductive success of Song Sparrows by depressing Sparrow recovery after catastrophic population declines. Also, with a large-scale removal on three heavily Cowbird-parasitized mainland sites, Jamie showed that Sparrows produced more young in Cowbird-reduced populations. This was sufficient to change his experimental removal sites from sinks to self-sustaining populations (Ecology 2002). In his last year, Jamie and co-authors completed a major synthesis of the Mandarte Island work in a book that Jamie illustrated, Conservation and Biology of Small Populations: the Song Sparrows of Mandarte Island (2006, Editors: J.N.M. Smith, L.F. Keller, A.B. Marr and P. Arcese, Oxford University Press). Sadly, he never saw the finished book, but he did have the satisfaction of completing a research synthesis of four generations of a scientific lineage. Jamie and co-authors used the Mandarte Island Song Sparrow Project and other island studies to review the breadth of problems that small isolated populations encounter, and they discuss the progress made on understanding regulatory mechanisms and the impacts of environmental change. Jamie's legacy is most closely associated with his field study of the Mandarte Island Song Sparrows for which he was awarded the Doris Huestis Speirs Award from the Society of Canadian Ornithologists (2000) and the Brewster Award from The American Ornithologists’ Union (2002). Over his career, Jamie took on many ecological orthodoxies such as optimal foraging, survival–fecundity tradeoffs and the role of invasive species in ecosystems. Rather than generating more new theory, he attempted rigorous tests of new and the refinement of established concepts. With collaborators from around the world, Jamie contributed over 100 papers, three books and many book chapters, primarily on birds, but also on insects, plants, amphibians, and marine and terrestrial mammals in arctic, temperate and tropical ecosystems. Many will regard Jamie's most enduring legacy as one of outstanding mentorship and tutelage in science at all levels. Jamie's ‘influence list’ (how many people influenced, how much and whose life was changed) is very long, as indicated by the many students and colleagues who kept in touch with him, some for several decades. His love of nature was boundless and absolutely contagious, inspiring a generation of ornithologists. He supervised over 35 graduate students and nine postdoctoral fellows in addition to countless undergraduate students. Jamie was a wonderful mentor, always supportive, concerned and interested in the personal and professional fortunes of his colleagues and former students. His mentoring style was versatile and provided necessary guidance without hovering, and lots of latitude for students in an independent phase. There was high demand from students and colleagues for his incisive and often cartoon-illustrated feedback on research papers and proposals. His ‘red pen was ripping’ until two days before his death! Jamie and his wife and fellow zoologist, Judy Myers, were renowned for hosting social science events to allow graduate students and colleagues to meet scientists visiting UBC. Daughter Isla, currently completing a PhD in Ecology at the University of Alberta, and son Iain, studying for a BSc in Agro-Ecology at UBC, grew up with gatherings of scientists invading their home. After a relaxed meal and brew, the visitor was often roasted with energy or slow-basted on their research seminar depending on the resident–visitor dynamics. Many graduate students cite this as one of the most positive and influential aspects of their academic development at UBC. To acknowledge the importance of Jamie's mentoring contributions, the Society of Canadian Ornithologists established The Jamie N.M. Smith Memorial Award for Mentoring in Ornithology in 2006. Jamie was active in naturalist societies, served on various conservation boards and panels, gave advice to conservation policy-makers and helped draft early legislation for the Canadian Species At Risk Act. In 2003, Jamie was awarded The Kay Beamish Award for Nature Education by the Vancouver Natural History Society. He was also an active member of the National Science Advisory Committee of Bird Studies Canada, something he could do by email when energy allowed. Jamie Smith will be remembered as a talented synthesist and staunch advocate of rigorous avian science. He was an insightful scientist, passionate conservationist, dedicated teacher and gifted naturalist who maintained a healthy balance of work and play, dedication to family and community service. Jamie accepted the harsh reality of his illness with courage, optimism and immense dignity. To the end, he continued a large email correspondence with friends and colleagues, many of whom did not realize the advanced stage of his illness. Jamie Smith leaves an enormous legacy of high-quality enduring science, and he trained a large cohort of prominent researchers, educators and other science professionals. His untimely loss resonates strongly through many levels of ornithology and conservation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,159
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,694

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,3060,466

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,265
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIbisMême sujetAvian ecology and behaviorTravaux en français237 207