Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Medical Council of Canada (MCC) has created an Assessment Review Task Force to formally consider all recommendations in Canada's ambitious “Future of Medical Education in Canada” project, assess aspects of the project related to its examinations, and report back within the next two years on how the Council can best support the changes suggested.The Future of Medical Education project was launched by the Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada to change Canada's approach to medical education in a way that better meets current and future health care needs.Canada, like many western nations, is experiencing significant demographic and workforce shifts, from an increasingly large number of Canadian students studying medicine abroad, to changing public expectations of the role physicians should play as health care providers, to a new movement in the regulatory community towards common standards for licensure.As a part of its work, the Task Force will examine these changes and their impact on the assessment of physicians in Canada. It will identify any additional competencies that may require assessment in the future to ensure that physicians meet appropriate standards of care for licensure in Canada.According to MCC, the Task Force will work closely with Canada's regulatory community to better understand how it uses MCC's examinations currently. It will perform literature reviews and interviews with key experts to find out more about other potential physician assessments that might be added to its current assessment structure, and how these assessments might be of value throughout a physician's education, training and practice.Source: Medical Council of Canada website, June 2010Ireland's Minister for Health & Children has formally launched Part 11 of the 2007 Medical Practitioners Act, requiring physicians to participate in a new program of maintenance of professional competence.Ireland's Medical Council, which regulates physicians and medical practice, called the new program a milestone for the medical profession that will help promote the safety of patients.Part 11 of the Medical Practitioners Act, which is the final part of the act to be implemented, stipulates that all registered medical practitioners in Ireland must participate in maintenance of professional competence, including a process of engagement in continuing professional development (CPD) and clinical audit. All physicians must be engaged with the new process by 2011.The Medical Council assured physicians that its new process would not be overly burdensome, with Medical Council President Kieran Murphy saying: “For the majority of doctors this is the formalization in law of a process with which they are already voluntarily engaged.”Murphy said that the cost of the new process would not be significant for physicians or for organizations that provide medical education.“The majority of doctors are already involved in professional development, so I cannot see the introduction of this scheme creating a financial burden for them,” he said.“It is a very positive development for the profession and for patients who can now be certain that their doctor is maintaining their level of knowledge and skills. This will help to ensure that patients are getting the best possible care,” Murphy said.More information about Ireland's new maintenance of professional competence process is available at the Medical Council website at www.medicalcouncil.ie.Source: Medical Council of Ireland news release, May 31, 2010
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,323 | 0,123 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».