MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4229749238 · doi:10.2523/66343-ms

Parallel Computing Techniques for Large-Scale Reservoir Simulation of Multi-Component and Multiphase Fluid Flow

2001· article· en· W4229749238 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
K. Zhang, Yingcong Wu, C. Ding, K. Pruess, E. Elmroth

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCitationComputer scienceNational laboratoryMultiphase flowScale (ratio)Library scienceEngineeringGeographyCartographyPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Parallel Computing Techniques for Large-Scale Reservoir Simulation of Multi-Component and Multiphase Fluid Flow K. Zhang; K. Zhang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Y.S. Wu; Y.S. Wu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar C. Ding; C. Ding Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar K. Pruess; K. Pruess Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar E. Elmroth E. Elmroth Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, February 2001. Paper Number: SPE-66343-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/66343-MS Published: February 11 2001 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Get Permissions Search Site Citation Zhang, K., Wu, Y.S., Ding, C., Pruess, K., and E. Elmroth. "Parallel Computing Techniques for Large-Scale Reservoir Simulation of Multi-Component and Multiphase Fluid Flow." Paper presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, February 2001. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/66343-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference Search Advanced Search AbstractMassively parallel computing techniques can overcome limitations of problem size and space resolution for reservoir simulation on single-processor machine. This paper reports on our work to parallelize a widely used numerical simulator, known as TOUGH2, for nonisothermal flows of multi-component, multiphase fluids in three-dimensional porous and fractured media. We have implemented the TOUGH2 package on a Cray T3E-900, a distributed-memory massively parallel computer with 695 processors. For the simulation of large-scale multicomponent, multiphase fluid flow, the requirements for computer memory and computing time are extensive. Because of the limitation of computer memory in each PE (processing element), we distribute not only computing time but also the memory requirement to different PEs. In this study, the METIS software package for partitioning unstructured graph and meshes is adopted for domain partitioning, and the Aztec linear solver package is used for solving linear equation systems. The efficiency of the code is investigated through the modeling of a three-dimensional variably saturated flow problem, which involves more than one million gridblocks. The execution time and speedup are evaluated through comparing the performance of different numbers of processors. The results indicate that the parallel code can significantly improve capacity and efficiency for large-scale simulations.IntroductionTOUGH21,2 is a general-purpose numerical simulation program for multi-dimensional, multiphase, multicomponent heat and fluid flows in porous and fractured media. The code is written in standard ANSI FORTRAN 77. Since its release in 1991, the program has been used worldwide in geothermal reservoir engineering, nuclear waste isolation, environmental assessment and remediation, and modeling flow and transport in variably saturated media. The numerical scheme of the TOUGH2 code is based on the integral finite difference (IFD) method. The conservation equations involving mass of air, water, chemical components and thermal energy are discretized in space using the IFD method. Time is discretized fully implicitly using a first-order backward finite difference scheme. The discretized nonlinear system of finite difference equations for mass and energy balances are solved simultaneously using the Newton/Raphson iterative scheme. For the basic version (i.e., single CPU), the code is equipped with both direct and iterative solvers.3The development of parallel computers has made it possible to conduct large-scale reservoir simulations. In the past decade, the total number of gridblocks used in a typical reservoir simulation increased from thousands to millions.4 One of the most popular parallel computer architectures is the distributed-memory machine, the massively parallel processor (MPP) computer, which can be made up of hundreds to thousands of processors. Elmroth et al.5 developed a parallel prototype scheme for the TOUGH2 code and implemented the computing time distribution on MPP computer. Their investigation indicates that a parallel code can dramatically enhance computational efficiency. Keywords: modeling & simulation, upstream oil & gas, artificial intelligence, multiphase flow, time step, fluid dynamics, equation system, linear equation system, computer, information Subjects: Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, Reservoir Simulation, Information Management and Systems, Flow in porous media, Multiphase flow This content is only available via PDF. 2001. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,282 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of SPE Reservoir Simulation SymposiumMême sujetReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsTravaux en français237 207