Maximising research outcomes for trans children and their families in Canada using social action and other participatory methods of inquiry
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction ‘To me it's really that, it's that the person who has a gender creative child or trans child or fluid or whatnot, is not going to be shoved or pushed by the medical community or the school community or social services and get their kid taken away. Like that was my biggest fear at that point when I started out, was that my kid was going to be taken away.’ (Akiko Asano, President of Gender Creative Kids Canada, 8 May 2013) Akiko Asano is a single parent of two children, the youngest of whom, Mat, who was born a biological boy, identifies as trans. Now aged 15, Mat was just two when she began to show a strong preference for wearing dresses and playing with dolls, and began to live as a girl full time at the age of four. Although many in Akiko's community were supportive of her parenting, not all were, and when Mat was about six, Akiko was briefly investigated by social services. The complaint? That Akiko was trying to change her child's ‘sexual orientation’. Although the case was quickly dismissed, many other North American families have not been so lucky. Indeed, although there is still limited evidence, some children have been forcibly removed from the care of parents who allow their children to live in accordance with their felt sense of gender (see Manning et al, forthcoming, for a discussion of child apprehension prompted by a child's gender non-conformity). A growing body of scholarship suggests that childhood gender non-conformity is a natural part of human diversity. Indeed, research suggests that between 2.3% and 8.3% of children (Moller et al, 2009, pp 118-19) engage in varying degrees of cross-gender dress and behaviour, and of those, a small number will end up following through with gender change interventions later on in their lives (Meyer, 2012). The problem is, Western society continues to be structured on the basis of a gender binary in which a child's failure to conform to their assigned birth sex, has often resulted in the pathologisation of parent and child (Langer and Martin, 2004). The fact that another member of Akiko's community viewed her parenting as ‘harmful’ and thus requiring state intervention, suggests the degree to which gross misunderstandings about gender identity continue to prevail.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,063 | 0,040 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,033 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,012 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».