Abstract 2683: Biomarkers of glucose homeostasis and inflammation and risk of prostate cancer: A case-cohort study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer especially low-grade and localized prostate cancer. The association with aggressive prostate cancer is inconclusive. Few studies have directly examined the associations of diabetes biomarkers with prostate cancer risk. Methods: Among a cohort of 13,994 men who were on average 70.2 years (SD=5.5) and cancer free at blood draw between 1998 and 2001, 1,206 developed non-aggressive prostate cancer and 313 developed aggressive prostate cancer (AJCC stage 3-4 or Gleason score 8-10) during follow-up through June 2013. We conducted a case-cohort study including a random sub-cohort of 1,303 men, 391 non-aggressive cases and 313 aggressive cases to examine circulating hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), c-peptide, and C-reactive protein (CRP) in relation to prostate cancer risk.Results: HbA1c, a biomarker of hyperglycemia, was inversely associated with non-aggressive prostate cancer after adjusting for age, race, family history of prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen screening, smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, and total energy intake (relative risk (RR) per unit increase: 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-1.00, P=0.04). Further adjustment for body mass index (BMI) attenuated the association. In contrast, HbA1c was associated with a higher risk of aggressive prostate cancer after adjusting for the covariates including BMI (RR per unit increase: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.98-1.25, P=0.11). In an analysis combining self-reported T2DM and HbA1c, men with T2DM and poor blood glucose control (HbA1c ≥6.5%) had a lower risk of developing non-aggressive prostate cancer (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.30-0.95) than men without T2DM and good blood glucose control (HbA1c <6.5%). After excluding men with self-reported T2DM, HbA1c was statistically significantly positively associated with risk of aggressive prostate cancer (RR per unit increase: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.04-1.51, P=0.02) but was not associated with non-aggressive prostate cancer. C-peptide and CRP were not associated with risk of either aggressive or non-aggressive prostate cancer.Conclusions: The present study suggests that men with hyperglycemia may have a lower risk of developing non-aggressive but a higher risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to examine the role of hyperglycemia in the etiology of aggressive prostate cancer and in prostate cancer progression.Citation Format: Ying Wang, Peter T. Campbell, Victoria L. Stevens, Christina C. Newton, Eric J. Jacobs, Michael Pollak, Susan M. Gapstur. Biomarkers of glucose homeostasis and inflammation and risk of prostate cancer: A case-cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2683.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».