Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Medical leadership: development and practice edition twoTo us -as editors -this special edition is even more special!This second journal edition dedicated to medical leadership highlights a strong movement, world-wide, to explore, investigate, and improve the role of the medical profession in shaping health reformand what needs to be done in order to prepare members of the profession for an enhanced role in that regard.Regardless of whether a doctor is in residence, beginning their career in a community or hospital, or well along in their clinical journey, there is a growing expectation that they will become involved -or as some of the literature says, engaged -in improvement, reform, or innovation of health service delivery.Government efforts to reform health care ultimately creates expectations that health regions, hospitals, primary care offices, and all the supporting casts, will change aspects of what they are doing to accommodate those "patient-centred" policy shifts.To do so means that all doctors, whether in clinical roles or administrative ones, will be affected.Many authors from the very countries represented by the articles in this special edition, have presented compelling arguments, accompanied by research, to validate the importance of engaging physicians in health reform.Some of the most compelling arguments have been found in earlier editions of the Leadership in Health Services journal.Most suggest that for physicians to become more actively involved in organizational decision making, they must develop leadership skills.These skills -regardless of whether they are for a CEO with a medical background, a doctor in a rural community, a specialist working in a hospital setting, or a salaried doctor in a hospital -position the physician to be most effective at ensuring good medical practice is imbued in service delivery changes.Or, for that matter, in the design of new capital projects dedicated to improved patient care.The articles in this special "special edition" highlight key efforts that are being made to grow and develop leadership within the medical community.Anne Matlow, Ming-Ka Chan and Jamiu Busari are part of an international team that is aiming at developing new leadership curriculum for residents in training.Anne outlines the international effort -called the Toronto Summit for Leadership Education for Physicians (TISLEP)where it came from, what it is doing, and how it is doing it.Ming-Ka Chan's article describes the rationale for the competency-based approach for this initiative: essentially spurred on by a major change in the Can Meds framework (used by 26 countries to guide medical education).In this change, the competency of "manager" is replaced by the competency of "leader".As a consequence, these three articles grapple with the changes required in resident education to embody developmental opportunities in leadership competency development.Jamui Busari's article, for example, explores the challenges in assessing leadership growth and development.Six other articles explore the challenges of growing leadership capability after medical school graduation.Colleen Grady examines the phenomenon of complexity and its implications for physician leaders -a valuable perspective for anyone seeking to LHS 29,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».