MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4229847075 · doi:10.2523/63167-ms

Horizontal Pumping Systems - High Pressure Injector or Pipeline Booster in the New High-Intake Pressure Application

2000· article· en· W4229847075 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
W.A Limanowka, Richard Grant, R.J. Kyle, Joel J. Maki

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueOil and Gas Production Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBooster (rocketry)CitationExhibitionInjectorPipeline (software)Computer scienceLibrary scienceHigh pressureOperations researchWorld Wide WebEngineeringOperating systemArt historyMechanical engineeringHistoryEngineering physics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Horizontal Pumping Systems - High Pressure Injector or Pipeline Booster in the New High-Intake Pressure Application W.A Andy Limanowka; W.A Andy Limanowka Centrilift Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Richard T. Grant; Richard T. Grant Pengrowth Corporation Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Rod J. Kyle; Rod J. Kyle Colt Engineering Corporation Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Joel Maki Joel Maki John Crane Canada Inc. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 2000. Paper Number: SPE-63167-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/63167-MS Published: October 01 2000 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Limanowka, W.A Andy, Grant, Richard T., Kyle, Rod J., and Joel Maki. "Horizontal Pumping Systems - High Pressure Injector or Pipeline Booster in the New High-Intake Pressure Application." Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 2000. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/63167-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractHorizontal Pumping System (HPS) is a surface application of a Multistage Centrifugal Pump originally designed for submersible service. HPS's are highly flexible in operation. Suction pressures can vary from 50 to 2500 PSI and the standard design discharge pressure can be up to 5000PSI. Variable flow rates can be achieved with a flow control valve without changing the operating speed, which eliminates the expensive Variable Speed Controller. Re-circulation lines and isolation valves are not required so the required piping is very simple compared to Positive Displacement (PD) pump installations. Unlike PD pumps, HPS can be deadheaded for a short time without damage. If a line plugs or a valve closes there is little danger of having the line or pump burst. HPS can be started against full system back pressure or with no back pressure at all. HPS's operate very quietly with very low line vibrations, as the HPS's are not generating fluid pulsation typical to PD installations. It can be easily designed as a Zero Emission system for operation in hazardous fluids with double seals with blocking fluids and control systems to ensure that the produced fluid will not escape to the environment. PLC can be easily tied into the HPS to control flow, pressure, tank level, speed, etc. Units can be run in parallel or series configuration. Heavy foundations are not required and it can be used as a portable unit. There is a significant reduction in maintenance cost, as there is little field maintenance required. Pump repair time can be as little as one day. Modular components allow for easy field retrofit. Due to the simple design of HPS, it can be operated remotely.We will present in this paper a very challenging HPS application as a Water Injection Line Booster with Pengrowth Corporation in Judy Creek, Alberta. This unit was designed to boost pipeline pressure on average from 13. 5MPa (1958PSIg) to 17. 2MPa (2500PSIg) at the flow rate of 5900 m3d (1080gpm). The intake seal utilized in this design is very special in nature as this application presents a challenge on several fronts. The process fluid is slightly sour water at about 65C° with suspended solids that are abrasive, but the challenge is that the suction pressure is dynamically variable between 11MPa (1595PSIg) to 15MPa (2175PSIg). The engineers from the seal supplier came up with a solution to answer all of these concerns with a promise to make it work. The seal selected was a back to back double seal with a high-pressure lubricator. The inboard seal sees a differential pressure of about 690kPa (100PSIg) (barrier fluid pressure 100PSIg above suction pressure) and the outboard seal sees full barrier fluid pressure, up to 15. 7Mpa (2275PSIg). A very unique design feature of the inboard seal is that it is able to handle a full reverse pressure either from the barrier or product sides. The high-pressure barrier fluid lubrication unit was designed to maintain the pressure of the mechanical seal barrier fluid above the fluctuating pump intake pressure. The cooperation between HPS supplier, Engineering Firm, seal supplier, and field operator ensured a successful pump and seal installation in a very challenging application.IntroductionThis paper will present a unique application for the installation of a Horizontal Pumping System (HPS). The pumping application is an installation of a multi-stage, centrifugal pump that was originally designed for "submersible pumping applications. " This project offered new engineering challenges, some of which are:The pump required modifications/redesign to operate with a high suction pressure up to 15MPa (2175PSIg).The Horizontal Thrust Chamber was redesigned for operation with the shaft travel limited to 0.006".The mechanical seal was designed to operate with pump suction pressures varying from 11MPa (1595PSIg) to 15.0MPa (2175PSIg). Keywords: barrier fluid, production chemistry, suction pressure, spe 63167, barrier fluid pressure, corrosion inhibition, high pressure injector, bearing, artificial lift system, multiphase pump Subjects: Artificial Lift Systems, Production Chemistry, Metallurgy and Biology, Electric submersible pumps, Hydraulic and jet pumps, Corrosion inhibition and management (including H2S and CO2) This content is only available via PDF. 2000. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,591
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,547

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionMême sujetOil and Gas Production TechniquesTravaux en français237 207