Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In compiling and editing this set of essays, we have tried to do four things. First we have sought to add to historical analysis of gender in sport by concentrating on rugby football which, historically, has been viewed as one of the most masculine and manly sports - particularly in the British Isles and the settler empire. In selecting this (and the other three themes) we have inevitably chosen not to address other issues and questions that are also important. For example, in relation to the issue of gender, we have not asked questions relating to women&s;s rugby such as &s;What does women playing this highly masculine team game mean?&s; Our silence on this should not be taken to mean that we see women&s;s rugby as unimportant or that we have concluded that women&s;s rugby is purely a novelty. The same should be said of our selectivity in terms of culture and country. We certainly do not dismiss rugby in France, Argentina, Canada, the Pacific Islands, Romania or elsewhere as unimportant, any more than our selection of men&s;s rugby is dismissive of the women&s;s game. Indeed most of these contexts are examined in our companion volume The Rugby World. In many of the countries we analyse here, women&s;s rugby is a very recent phenomenon, largely because of male resistance against women playing such a &s;manly&s; game. In New Zealand and Australia, for example, women&s;s rugby clubs are generally tied to male unions and clubs. Women&s;s teams are generally coached by males and tend to have their schedules set around the men&s;s in order to ensure access to facilities. This fact suggests the continued marginalization of women and promotes continued male hegemony. We have chosen to look at this and other associated questions through the lenses of nationalism, sexuality, homophobia and even homoeroticism. Thus in addressing the marginalization issue, David Andrews suggests that in Wales, where rugby is a huge part of the national identity and culture, women have indeed been marginalized in the past because of the patriarchal ideologies at work within the nation. We suggest that if men and women are viewed relationally rather than opposition ally, then it is possible to draw some conclusions about women from many of these discussions of men&s;s rugby. This does not mean that analysis of women&s;s rugby is unnecessary; indeed it is time for major work to be done in this area.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,094 | 0,044 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».