MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4230115374 · doi:10.30770/2572-1852-98.3.27

International Briefs

2012· article· en· W4230115374 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Medical Regulation · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueMedical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Medical Council of New Zealand Chief Executive Philip Pigou was recently installed as chair of the International Association of Medical Regulatory Authorities (IAMRA) for a two-year term.Addressing delegates at IAMRA's biennial conference, held in Ottowa, Canada, October 2–5, Pigou said international medical regulators must do three things in order to better ensure patient safety worldwide:“All of these directions require good relationships within IAMRA — and with other relevant groups,” he said. “There have been and continue to be policy issues that many of us face in our day-to-day practice. This includes how we ensure doctors are competent to practice. Whether we call it recertification, revalidation or maintenance of licensure — ensuring the competence of doctors is one major policy issue we face.”“Even recognizing that different countries come with different histories, have developed different models of regulation — and different terminology — the sharing of knowledge and ideas helps promote excellence for not just doctors, but all health professionals,” he said.During the conference, titled “Medical Regulation in the Real World: Bringing Evidence to Bear,” delegates continued their work on IAMRA's recent long-term initiative to create a set of global best practices to help guide medical regulators.Pigou has served as chief executive officer of the Medical Council of New Zealand since November 2005. He has also worked in senior positions in New Zealand's legal sector as well as its health sector. He has a bachelor of law degree and a postgraduate diploma in business, focusing on general management and leadership.IAMRA is a membership organization representing regulators all over the world. It was formed in 2000. For more information, please visit www.iamra.com.Source: IAMRA news release, October 11, 2012The United Kingdom General Medical Council's (GMC) latest annual report, released in October, shows a 23 percent rise in the number of complaints it received against doctors in 2011. The increase, from 7,153 in 2010 to 8,781 in 2011, is part of a trend that began in 2007.In the report, titled “The State of Medical Education and Practice In The UK: 2012,” the GMC also notes that the likelihood a complaint will be investigated has risen from one in 68 in 2010 to one in 64 in 2011. GMC officials said the report shows a rise in complaints about interaction with patients, with communication issues increasing by 69 percent and a “perceived lack of respect” rising by 45 percent. Over the year, the GMC took action in over 500 cases, permanently removing 65 physicians from medical practice, while 93 were suspended.The report uses GMC data and information from other sources to provide a general snapshot of the medical profession in the UK and “to identify some of the barriers and enablers to good medical practice.” According to the GMC, this year's report shows that the composition of the UK's medical profession continues to change, “as do the demands placed upon it.”Of 245,903 physicians on the GMC's register, 57 percent are male (141,369) and 43 percent are female (104,534). Fifty seven percent of physicians in the UK are between the ages of 25 and 44, while 33 percent are between the ages of 45 and 64.The number of physicians on the UK's register of physicians continues to grow, and for the first time, the number of female physicians passed the 100,000 mark.The GMC also said the UK faces many of the same workforce issues being discussed in the United States: “There is a continuing debate about the distribution of doctors across specialties, particularly whether we have an appropriate balance between specialists and generalists, and if we have enough doctors in the right specialties to care for an aging population,” the report summarizes.According to the GMC, the report shows that “changing lifestyles and expectations of doctors mean that the need for flexible working and training is becoming increasingly important.”In noting the rise of complaints against physicians, the GMC said it received proportionally more complaints about men, older physicians and general practitioners — a trend that was similar in 2010.The 2012 report shows that on average, smaller hospitals tended to receive higher numbers of complaints about physicians than larger hospitals. According to the GMC, the report also suggests that patient outcomes are worse on evenings and weekends — times when less experienced physicians are working.“In some specialties, recruitment difficulties are affecting both service provision and training, particularly ensuring that doctors in training have access to adequate supervision and protected time for education,” the GMC said.Source: The State of Medical Education and Practice in the UK: 2012, GMC website, October 2012The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) — the organization representing the UK's family physicians — has compiled what it calls “Highway Code” guidelines to help physicians use social media sites like Facebook and Twitter appropriately.The RCGP says its Social Media Highway Code offers family physicians positive, practical tips and advice on how to get the most out of online communications.Over the past decade, according to the RCGP, there has been a substantial increase in the proportion of the UK population using the internet, from 59 percent in 2005 to 79 percent in 2011. Social media use has grown from 22 percent of internet users in 2007 to 59 percent in 2011. Among the young, the RCGP reports that social media use is now almost “ubiquitous,” with a 2012 UK survey finding 95 percent of 16–20 year-olds and 74 percent of 20–25 year-olds had used Facebook in the previous month.While the number of physician users of social media is not as high, it is growing. A recent survey by the UK's Medical Protection Society (MPS) found 36 percent of respondents using Facebook and 21 percent using Twitter on a daily basis. “Among younger doctors, the use of social media is now the norm,” said the RCGP in announcing its social media guidelines.The RCGP's Highway Code offers 10 basic guidelines as the foundation for good social media practices:In releasing its guidelines, the RCGP noted that they represent a first version intended for further discussion and review; revisions and updates are possible. “Above all, the Social Media Highway Code is intended as a guide to help doctors with their decision-making and not as a book of prescriptive rules,” the RCGP wrote in an introduction to the guidelines. “Our main aim is to encourage doctors to think, communicate and share experiences freely and openly, whilst remaining aware of their professional responsibilities and the influence their online presence may have on others.”The Federation of State Medical Boards released similar guidelines for U.S. physicians in April of this year. They are available at www.fsmb.org/pdf/pub-social-media-guidelines.pdf.The RCGP guidelines are available at www.rcgp.org.uk/policy/rcgp-policy-areas/social-media-highway-code.aspx.Source: Royal College of General Practitioners website, October 2012

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,405
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,014
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,089
Tête enseignante GPT0,507
Écart entre enseignants0,417 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle