MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4230120175 · doi:10.1149/ma2019-01/23/1172

(Gordon E. Moore Medal for Outstanding Achievement in Solid State Science and Technology Award Address) Towards Silicon-Based Photonic Integrated Circuits: The Quest for Compatible Light Sources

2019· article· en· W4230120175 sur OpenAlexaff
D. J. Lockwood

Notice bibliographique

RevueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiquePhotonic and Optical Devices
Établissements canadiensNational Research Council Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMicroelectronicsPhotonicsSilicon photonicsIntegrated circuitElectronicsMaterials scienceOptical interconnectInterconnectionPhotonic integrated circuitComputer scienceOptoelectronicsOptical communicationElectrical engineeringFabricationEngineering physicsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Optoelectronics and photonics are playing an essential role in many aspects of daily life, including information and communication technologies, environmental and green technologies, mechanical and chemical sensing, consumer electronics, and biomedicine. So far, the use of optical components in communication systems has been mainly limited to direct replacement of electrical cables by optical cables. With the continual increase in link bit rates, optical cables are now replacing electrical cables for shorter and shorter interconnect lengths. Optoelectronic and photonic technologies are becoming less costly and more integrated, and there is currently an opportunity for optics to move “inside the box” and change the interconnect topology at all levels. Optical interconnects are required these days for on-chip technology as an alternative to metal wires, because of data transmission bottlenecks introduced by their unavoidable delay times, significant signal degradation, problems with power dissipation, and electromagnetic interference. Such optical interconnects will help in extending the life of Moore’s Law [1]. Currently, most optoelectronic devices are fabricated as discrete components. This approach is based on serial (e.g., step-by-step) fabrication and packaging, and it makes optoelectronic technology drastically different compared to microelectronics, where the domination of parallel fabrication made possible ultra large scale integration. Also, discrete assembly reduces the optoelectronic system reliability and decreases the manufacturing yield. Additional complications arise due to materials issues: in microelectronics the major material is elemental silicon, while traditional semiconductor materials for optoelectronics are III-V compound alloys with much more complex technological requirements. Finally, optical waveguides and waveguide based devices are very bulky compared to electron devices; thus, the densities of electron devices in integrated circuits are many orders of magnitude greater compared to that in integrated optoelectronic systems. Silicon photonics, where photonics devices are fabricated by using silicon or silicon compatible materials and where the manufacturing is based on the available microelectronics infrastructure, is emerging as the technology that can face all these challenges [2]. Silicon photonics is booming and growing at an incredible pace with many breakthroughs appearing day by day [3,4]. Speed, integration density, active components, logic, nonlinear optics, etc., are all surpassed frontiers, which silicon photonics has continuously moved apart. Many devices enabled by silicon photonics are already on the market and new ones are emerging continually [5]. Despite these advances, the major deficiency in such optoelectronic and photonic devices remains the lack of suitable silicon-based light emitters and especially lasers, which would enable a fully integrated silicon platform. In order to be commercially viable, these light emitters need to be efficient, fast, operational at room temperature, and, perhaps most importantly, be compatible with mainstream CMOS technology. Another important requirement is in the emission wavelength, which should match the optical waveguide low-loss spectral region of 1.3–1.6 μm. The main problem in utilizing silicon as a light emitter is its indirect electronic band gap that results in inefficient carrier recombination and a long radiative lifetime. Many quite different approaches to alleviating the miserable light emission in bulk silicon (~10-4 quantum efficiency at 300 K) have been proposed and are actively being explored [6]. Some, such as Si1-xGex quantum well or Si/SiO2 superlattice structures, rely on band structure engineering, while others rely on quantum confinement effects in lower dimensional structures, as typified by silicon quantum dots or porous silicon. Still another approach is impurity-mediated luminescence from, for example, isoelectronic substitution or by the addition of rare earth or transition metal ions to silicon. In this presentation, the use of the quantum confinement approach we have employed to producing efficient light emission in silicon and germanium will be reviewed. Nanostructured systems that will be covered include porous silicon, silicon quantum wells and wires, super unit cells, and arrays of silicon-germanium quantum dots. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law L. Pavesi and D.J. Lockwood, Silicon Photonics (Springer, Berlin, 2004). Special issue on Silicon Photonics, Proc. IEEE 97(7), July (2009). D.J. Lockwood and L. Pavesi, Silicon Photonics II: Components and Integration (Springer, Berlin, 2011). L. Pavesi and D.J. Lockwood, Silicon Photonics III: Systems and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 2016). D.J. Lockwood, Light Emission in Silicon (Academic, New York, 1998).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,146
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,490

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1460,120

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueECS Meeting AbstractsMême sujetPhotonic and Optical DevicesTravaux en français237 207