MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4230184539 · doi:10.2118/187264-ms

Rapid and Consistent Identification of Stratigraphic Boundaries and Stacking Patterns in Well-logs - An Automated Process Utilizing Wavelet Transforms and Beta Distributions

2017· article· en· W4230184539 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shin-Ju Ye, Robert W. Wellner, Paul Dunn

Notice bibliographique

RevueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeologySedimentary depositional environmentFaciesWaveletWavelet transformScale (ratio)Computer scienceStackingPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceStructural basinPaleontologyCartography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Historically, well log response and pattern matching have been used to define surface-based stratal frameworks, identify depositional facies, and distribute rock properties within subsurface geologic models. Framework surfaces are typically defined by relatively abrupt changes in lithologic trends and/or log curve shape. However, the significance, types, and locations of surfaces defined using this subjective technique can be highly variable and can result in significantly different interpretations. The semi-automated, well log pattern recognition methodology proposed here mitigates many of these inconsistencies and can yield more accurate frameworks by detecting and highlighting patterns in suites of logs that may otherwise have been missed by an interpreter. This innovative method is capable of identifying, with little or no user input, the stratal stacking pattern expressed in a typical oil-field well log suite. Furthermore, this method generates a hierarchy of surface bounded, rock packages that can used to build a consistent, repeatable stratigraphic framework for a field or basin, by removing interpreter-specific biases. This new method can detect subtle, but stratigraphically important breaks in deposition or erosion, which if ignored will result in stratal architectures with little or no predictive capability. A typical one-dimensional well log signal can be transformed into a joint, two-dimensional wavelet-scale and log-depth representation using a continuous wavelet transform (CWT). The resulting multi-scale CWT phase image of a well log exhibits (after mirroring) oval-shaped patterns that correspond surface-bounded depositional packages. The nesting and encapsulation of smaller ovals by larger ovals reveals multi-scale hierarchical patterns carried within the well log signal that is not readily apparent upon visual inspection. In order to extract the boundary information from CWT phase images, a significance-of-cone (SOC) method has been developed to quantify the significance of the smoothed cones located at the tops and bases of the CWT mirrored ovals. Ranked, hierarchical boundaries are then derived from the integration of SOC curves from all available logs each weighted according to interpreter wishes. In summary, individual CWT-derived ovals represent discrete depositional packages, while the SOC-derived surfaces may reflect the extent to which individual sedimentary packages are genetically linked or separated by discontinuities. The utility and accuracy of this automated method was tested on a suite of logs from the Mannville Group, lower Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada. Here, we compared CWT results to a subset of wells (~40 wells) from a larger dataset of >200 wells in regional cross sections that were analyzed over many months and used to define a sequence stratigraphic framework for a portion of the Mannville Group. Of the 1400+ surfaces (tops) identified using the classic, but time consuming sequence stratigraphic approach, we were able to rapidly identify and replicate 75% of the manually identified tops, generally to within ±1 meter of significant boundaries picked by the program. Furthermore, we argue that the surfaces that comprise the missing 25% may not be significant, framework building surfaces and could be ignored with little effect on the understanding of the Mannville Group stratigraphy. A spectrum of simple and common curve shapes, such as coarsening-upward, fining-upward, bell, funnel and cylindrical shapes can be described by two shape parameters, which are referred to as α and β, within a Beta distribution. A numerical method has been developed to fit a Beta distribution to diagnostic shapes observed on well log curves. Each Beta-distribution curve shape can be represented by a point on an α-β cross plot, which allows visualization of curve shape related interpretations in absolute parametric space. Well log curve shapes within and among stratigraphic units can be visualized using appropriate color coding and interactivity between a 3D or map view and the α-β cross plot. This method provides an efficient and consistent foundation for well log lithofacies distributions within stratigraphic units or zones and provides a solid foundation for interpretation of depositional facies and 3-D modeling of rock properties.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: Méthodes
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionMême sujetSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesTravaux en français237 207