MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4230398259 · doi:10.5325/weslmethstud.8.1.0067

Review

2015· article· en· W4230398259 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMormonism, Religion, and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAnachronismHistoriographyHistoryArt historySection (typography)ClassicsLawPolitical scienceArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Thanks to the respective studies of Susan O'Brien, Leigh Eric Schmidt, W. R. Ward, Michael Crawford, and David Ceri Jones, modern scholars of eighteenth-century evangelicalism tend to view the various ‘awakenings’ during this period not as isolated local events, but as part of a much greater transatlantic episode. Indeed, O'Brien has spoken of a ‘transatlantic community of saints’, which was responsible for exchanging news of revivals across the Atlantic world.In line with these recent trends in the historiography, Jonathan Yeager has compiled an impressive anthology of primary literature relating to early evangelicalism, which incorporates an exhaustive range of evangelical authors from both sides of the Atlantic. However, before any of this is discussed, attention needs to be drawn to Yeager's introductory chapter, which manages to be both concise and informative at the same time. In this section, Yeager addresses the question of how one should define ‘evangelicalism’ by outlining the widely accepted Bebbington quadrilateral of biblicism, conversionism, crucicentrism, and activism. Importantly, when describing the authors whom this anthology includes, Yeager justifies his wise decision not to dwell on the likes of John Wesley and Jonathan Edwards by directing his readers to existing anthologies which are solely dedicated to these giant figures.Moving on to the main body of the anthology itself, one of the most positive aspects of this volume is Yeager's demonstration of how evangelicalism transcended gender, racial, and (to use an anachronism) class boundaries. Yeager achieves this by including the thoughts and views of those evangelicals, who, for whatever reason, were socially at a disadvantage. These include a range of female evangelicals—some relatively famous (e.g. Anne Steele and Hannah More)—others less so (an extract from the diary of Hannah Heaton, a New Englander, who struggled with her marriage to an ‘unregenerate’ man, makes fascinating reading). The fact that the Great Awakening sometimes affected the labouring poor is also demonstrated by Yeager's inclusion of the Connecticut farmer Nathan Cole's conversion narrative, which resulted from Cole's attendance at one of George Whitefield's open-air services. Finally, extracts from the works of Samson Occom, Phillis Wheatley, and Olaudah Equiano remind us that evangelicalism penetrated racial boundaries, often resulting in the conversions of Native Americans and blacks.Another key strength of this anthology is the diverse range of primary sources which Yeager incorporates. These include: extracts from the sermons of such prominent itinerants as Whitefield and Gilbert Tennent, hymns from the likes of Charles Wesley, Isaac Watts, and John Newton, articles from such pro-revivalist newspapers as The Glasgow-Weekly History and The Christian History, the conversion narratives of laymen like Howell Harris and the aforementioned Cole, and, finally, spiritual diaries.At the beginning of each extract, the reader is treated to an introduction to the author concerned. As one would expect, the length of these introductions vary somewhat, depending on the prominence of the author. Nevertheless, even when dealing with the likes of the Wesley brothers, Whitefield, or Wilberforce, Yeager still manages to accomplish a strong level of concision without neglecting the key moments in the individual's life and, in some cases, how the person in question differed from other contemporary evangelicals. Indeed, Yeager's sensitivity to the nuances of early evangelicalism is evident from his references to John Wesley's famous quarrels with Whitefield over predestination, and, more interestingly, the lesser known differences between John and Charles Wesley. These introductions also contain much useful contextual information relating to the extract in question and, in the case of published sources, the message which the author was attempting to convey. Furthermore, it is pleasing to see that Yeager ends each extract by citing the provenance of these sources, should the reader wish to do further research on these texts.Finally, if this anthology is lacking anything, it is anti-revivalist primary sources, which are completely absent. Potentially, this could have incorporated a very broad range of individuals, including opponents of Methodism from within the Church of England (e.g. George Lavington and William Warburton), New England Congregationalists (e.g. Charles Chauncey), and even such visual satirists as William Hogarth. On a more minor note, these sources do sometimes appear to have been ordered in an unusual manner. This is especially true of the earlier sources dealing with the First Great Awakening, where we find an extract from the spiritual diary of Sarah Pierpont Edwards sandwiched between two sources relating to the Scottish revivals of 1742. Despite these observations, this volume fills a gap by providing a thorough yet concise introduction to the transatlantic revivals of the ‘long’ eighteenth century. Anybody who is new to the historical background of early evangelicalism should certainly make this excellent anthology their first port of call.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,313
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,356

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,269
Tête enseignante GPT0,364
Écart entre enseignants0,095 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle